This Phoenix Journal was generated by scanning a printed edition using optical character recognition (OCR). Although efforts have been made to correct errors readers should refer to the image-based or printed version if discrepancies need to be resolved.
COPYRIGHT POSITION STATEMENT AND DISCLAIMER
The Phoenix Journals are intended as a “real time” commentary on current events, how current events relate to past events and the relationships of both to the physical and spiritual destinies of mankind.
All of history, as we now know it, has been revised, rewritten, twisted and tweaked by selfishly motivated men to achieve and maintain control over other men. When one can understand that everything is comprised of “energy” and that even physical matter is “coalesced” energy, and that all energy emanates from God’s thought, one can accept the idea that the successful focusing of millions of minds on one expected happening will cause it to happen.
If the many prophecies made over thousands of years are accepted, these are the “end times” (specifically the year 2000, the second millennium, etc.). That would put us in the “sorting” period and only a few short years from the finish line. God has said that in the end-times would come the WORD--to the four corners of the world--so that each could decide his/her own course toward, or away from, divinity--based upon TRUTH.
So, God sends His Hosts--Messengers--to present that TRUTH. This is the way in which He chooses to present it, through the Phoenix Journals. Thus, these journals are Truth, which cannot be copyrighted; they are compilations of information already available on Earth, researched and compiled by others (some, no doubt, for this purpose) which should not be copyrighted. Therefore, these journals are not copyrighted (except SIPAPU ODYSSEY which is “fiction”).
The first sixty or so journals were published by America West Publishing which elected to indicate that a copyright had been applied for on the theory that the ISBN number (so necessary for booksellers) was dependent upon the copyright. Commander Hatonn, the primary author and compiler, insisted that no copyrights be applied for and, to our knowledge, none were.
If the Truth is to reach the four corners of the world, it must be freely passed on. It is hoped that each reader will feel free to do that, keeping it in context, of course.
RING AROUND THE ROSIE
First Edition Printed by
PHOENIX SOURCE PUBLISHERS, Inc.
P.O. Box 27353
Las Vegas, Nevada 89126
Printed in the United States of America
TABLE OF CONTENTS
THU., SEP. 1, 1994
BLASTING CLAIMS OF "ANTI-SEMITISM"
RING AROUND THE ROSIE I
SHARING THAT WHICH IS PRINTED
ISRAELIS REASSESS JEWISHNESS CLAIM
ZIONISTS AND GLOBALISTS AND ENFORCERS (MISHPUKA)
ROCKEFELLER AND MASS MURDER
THE RACIAL LAWS
TUE., AUG. 9, 1994
THE USURPERS, Part 14, by Medford Evans
WED., AUG. 10, 1994
JUST HOLD A LITTLE LONGER, FRIENDS
PHONE CALLS ON STOLEN NUMBERS
THE USURPERS, Part 15, by Medford Evans
THE SCHEMERS, Clark Clifford (Continued)
THU., AUG. 11, 1994
THE USURPERS, Part 16, by Medford Evans (1968)
THE SCHEMERS, CLARK CLIFFORD (Continued)
NEZ PERCE FACE NEO-NAZI INVASION By John Young
FRI., AUG. 12, 1994
RIPPED SLINGS AND BROKEN ARROWS
RUSSIAN EQUIPMENT (MILITARY)
VINCE FOSTER MURDER
FEMINIZING THE POPULATION
THE COURT SYSTEM
SUPPORT KEN VARDON & APFN
HOT, LAST-MINUTE NEWS
POPE DRAWS JEWISH IRE FOR KNIGHTING WALDHEIM
JUDGES OR CRIMINALS? by Eustace Mullins
COULD YOU BE AN ISRAELITE AND NOT KNOW IT?
ARISTIDE--ISRAEL AND HAITI'S DRUG SECRET
SAT., AUG 13, 1994
GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE
POWER TO ACCOMPLISH
INSURRECTION AND SUBVERSION?
CLUES TO THIS TRUTH OF POWER CONTROL AS IS
GUN CONTROL AND DISARMING YOU
PART 4--OTHER PROVISIONS
THINK THIS IS SOME "PATRIOT" GARBAGE?
SHOULD JEWS FEAR THE "CHRISTIAN RIGHT"?
COMING OF MOHAMMED PROPHESIED
AN OATH IS OF NO SUBSTANCE
SAT., AUG. 13, 1994
INSERT: PICTURE OF CLINTON WEARING HIS JEWISH SKULL CAP
ALLEGIANCE TO REVELATION'S HARLOT!
DESTRUCTIVE JEWISH-ZIONIST INFLUENCE!
BOBERTSON'S INTERPRETATIONS ARE WRONG!
ISRAEL TODAY IS NOT THE SAME AS ISRAEL OF THE OLD TESTAMENT!
WHO OCCUPIES JERUSALEM?
MOST JEWS ARE KHAZARS!
BILLY GRAHAM'S ROLE IN THE ZIONIST OCCUPATION!
SUN., AUG. 14, 1994
WHAT YOU DESERVE POSSIBLY?
THE RISE OF CITIZEN MILITIAS
THE REMAINDER OF THIS JOURNAL IS A COLLECTION OF TIMELY NEWS AND/OR EDUCATIONAL ITEMS
THE NEWS DESK, by Rick Martin 8/10/94
URGENT NOTICE FROM RONN JACKSON
RONN JACKSON UPDATE by Rick Martin 8/15/94
Re: THE. ORIGINAL BONUS BABY by V.K. Durham
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION & GATT
HOT RHETORIC AND THE WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION
PRIVACY IN THE WORKPLACE
IRAN & SATELLITE DISHES
NEW VARIANT OF HIV CAN GO UNDETECTED
BLACK HOLE IN WASHINGTON
THE CRIME BILL
JACK McLAMB UPDATE
EX-COP LABELED IMPERSONATOR PROTEST IN BLUE, by Jake Batsell
DR. PIERRE CLOUTIER INTERVIEWS, RONN JACKSON
IRS IS COLLECTION AGENCY FOR PRIVATE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
FUNDAMENTAL UNALIENABLE RIGHTS EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD KNOW!
BEWARE OF "GOOD OLD BOY" CONGRESSIONAL TRICKS
GRANDMA GOT A BREATH OF FRESH AIR!
KEEP THE PRESSURE OW
ROGERS' TENTH AMENDMENT RESOLUTION
THE CANCEROUS KHAZARIAN FAKE "JEWS" BLACK THREAD RUNNING THROUGH HISTORY, Nora's Comments
LINDA THOMPSON UPDATE
MILITIA ASSEMBLY CANCELLED FOR WASHINGTON D.C.
LINDA THOMPSON SKIRMISH DURING CRIME BILL PROTEST
SPECIAL PRESS RELEASE, by International Free Press Network
THE WHITEWATER HEARING OF THE CONGRESS
APPLICATION FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF AN INDEPENDENT COUNSEL, by Henk Visser
STEALING OUR NEWSPAPERS! Christian Defense League
INSERT: PICTURE OF JEWISH TERRORISTS WITH THE MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY
INSERT: MORE PICTURES OF JEWISH TERRORISTS OF NEW YORK
HIDDEN GOVERNMENT INFORMATION ON POWs & MIAs ADVOCACY AND INTELLIGENCE INDEX FOR PRISONERS OF WAR/MISSING IN ACTION, INC
This Journal is dedicated in loving honor to Geraldine Seeback and Dale Seeback who have both, each in their own time and way, brought the Light of Truth to those whose lives they have touched. We also dedicate this Journal to Terry Seeback whose generous support and faithful love have made the printing of this Journal possible.
REC #1 HATONN
THU., SEP. 1, 1994 8:30 A.M. YEAR 8, DAY 016
THU., SEP. 1, 1994
BLASTING CLAIMS OF "ANTI-SEMITISM"
I no longer find it acceptable to have to counter such claims as "anti-Semitic". I, and most of YOU, I repeat, ARE SEMITES. Most of those referring to themselves as "Semites" ARE NOT! So, WHO are the "revisionists" of historical truth? You will note that "your enemies" will ALWAYS grasp a "term" and change definitions of said word or term and reverse its meaning--so that somehow YOU are the culprit no matter on whose "side" you effort to reside.
How do I DARE speak of these things in TRUTH? Because, after a while--you must use the terminology (before it is changed) to express a point. "Jewishness" is taking a far different turn than you might expect, beloved readers--FAR DIFFERENT.
SHARING THAT WHICH IS PRINTED
To make a point about the limited definitions regarding "jew" and "non-jew" let me point out that CLAIMS by this self-styled community of Zionists from other than Hebrew lineage are now being seen openly all about your own nation but more severely and painfully by those of other nations thinking themselves to "qualify" by bloodline to be Israeli "Jew".
Within the past several years the Israelis were running "rescue" or "removal" of so-called "Jews" in Afghanistan. These are "Black jews" (color, not intent). These were often natives taken from the very back-country and flown to Israel. Most, by the way, ending up in rescue centers or as servants (mostly bonded) in service to the Ashkenazi Elite.
The pervasiveness against your freedom in America speaks loudly now as "marchers" of the Jewish organizations literally picket and cause uprisings in even small towns and cities as OTHERS of different intent than New World Order under One Government, United Nations or the Zionist Elite gather to discuss generalized political and national topics. It has, within the week, happened now, several times, right in local counties and cities of local geographical location. If you don't see the destruction of freedoms hidden beneath the false shoutings of "hate-groups", etc., then you are destined to fall into the trap of these Elitist would-be-Kings.
The pervasive influence of Jewish power upon American domestic and foreign policies is an issue that cries out for public discussion. It should be of concern to every American as to how an ethnocentric, religious group which comprises less than three percent of the population has become a leading factor in American politics. Yet, ironically, in America where free speech and press are constitutionally guaranteed, the subject has been almost completely ignored, buried and discussions disallowed by new "laws" in either extremely racist circles or in selected Jewish publications aimed at sympathetic readership.
Every time we write on the subject we are denounced, threatened, denied and literally bashed--through the "fixed" courts as well as in the press, media and other outlets who would end freedom under a Constitution long ago set aside by these same Elitists. So be it for it is now becoming harder and harder for the lies to be heard above the obvious truth of presentation. In this vein of thought let us just share an article from the DENVER POST.
Indeed, you are going to find that even the "Semitic Movement" enforced by the Mishpuka (Israeli Crime Syndicate [Cartel]) is also ONLY a "cover" for covert and overt operations of the Elite One World Committees and power brokers. However, it is the universal infiltration of "anti-Christ" into a mal-functioning world both in economics and politics.
So what do we have happening now in Palestine? (Israel). Let us consider this:
THE DENVER POST
August 24, 1994
Dan Perry, Associated Press
ISRAELIS REASSESS JEWISHNESS CLAIM
Liberal Law of Return under assault
JERUSALEM--Fear that millions of impoverished foreigners may try to make now-prosperous Israel their home by claiming Jewish ancestry is causing Israelis to reassess the cardinal question of Zionism: Who, exactly, is a Jew?
Deputy Foreign Minister Yossi Beilin spoke for many Israelis yesterday when he urged legislators to amend the LAW OF RETURN allowing instant citizenship to any applicant with one Jewish grandparent.
Beilin said the law--passed in 1950 when the nascent state was destitute and not a potential draw for non-Jews--is too liberal now that Israel is a relatively wealthy, industrialized nation.
"Many people are ready to move to Israel to become instant citizens just by claiming they are Jews", Beilin said. "There are tribes in India, in Eritrea, in Burma, who claim they are Jewish, lost tribes of Israel, or whatever".
Although Beilin was vague on how he would change the law, he got swift support from both hardline rabbis long concerned that lenient immigration policies would weaken Israel's Jewish character and even immigration officials.
Others said proposals for tinkering with the law smacked of racism. "(Zionism) drew strength from Jewish solidarity", stated the Haaretz daily in a commentary, "but now we SUDDENLY REMEMBER that a distant tribe is dark-skinned and emerges from the jungle". [H: There you have it! Suddenly?? "Remember"??--are the fish really dead or do they just stink??]
The head of immigration for the quasi-official Jewish Agency said he would propose limiting immigration rights TO THOSE WITH A JEWISH PARENT.
"THE 12 MILLION RECOGNIZED JEWS WHO STILL LIVE OUTSIDE ISRAEL ARE ENOUGH FOR ME", said Uri Gordon.
Those Jews recognized BY THE JEWISH AGENCY, which is devoted to immigration, include 6 million in the U.S., 2 million in the former Soviet Union, more than a million in Western Europe, as well as sizable populations in Argentina, South Africa and Australia. [H: Does anyone not find it interesting that the count of 6 million in the U.S. MATCHES THE SAME NUMBER CLAIMED TO HAVE BEEN KILLED IN THE HOLOCAUST?]
The assault on the law, designed to guarantee a safe haven to survivors of the Nazi Holocaust, appears to have been sparked by recent reports that up to 300 million INDIANS COULD CLAIM LINKS TO THE ANCIENT TRIBE OF MENASHE. THE BIBLE SAYS IT IS ONE OF 10 EXILED FROM ANCIENT ISRAEL IN 722 B.C. [H: Even if not spoken of here--HERE IS WHERE THE TALMUD INSTEAD OF THE "BIBLE" WILL TAKE OVER!]
A sizeable immigration from India would cause demographic upheaval in Israel, whose 4.5 million Jews are evenly divided between the dominant European-descended Ashkenazim and the Sephardim, or Jews of Middle Eastern origin. [H: You are also "nuts" if you think it is "evenly divided"!]
"When you have today such misery in Asia and Africa and all kinds of world-savers want to bring to our small and fragile state millions who are not Jews, I am definitely for changing the Law of Return", said Rabbi Avraham Ravitz, a religious legislator.
Israel's immigration minister last week termed the Indian tribe "a curiosity" and advised its members to WAIT FOR THE MESSIAH BEFORE APPLYING TO IMMIGRATE. [H: ?????] But Israel might have inadvertently created a precedent by allowing some 60 Indians in as tourists during the last two years. They remained as immigrants after agreeing to Israeli rabbis' demands they undergo strict religious conversion.
According to reports, hundreds of thousands of Indians have approached the Israeli embassy in New Delhi for applications.
In a faxed statement, India's embassy in Israel said the reports were "sheer exaggeration". But potential immigrants of debatable Jewishness are found all over.
There are reports up to one-third of the 600,000 former Soviet citizens who Israel has been fighting to absorb in the past four years aren't Jewish. Israel, acting on Zionist ideology, brought more than 20,000 Ethiopian Jews to Israel in two drives in 1984 and 1991.
Now, there is disagreement over whether to accept thousands of distant relatives of Israel's Ethiopians who are Christian but also claim Jewish roots or immigration rights for family reunification.
Gordon admitted Ethiopian Jewish immigrants have suffered discrimination. News reports focus on their difficulty in moving out of trailer parks for new immigrants into mainstream Israeli life.
In Peru, a rabbi found a tribe of natives also claiming Jewish roots. "Imagine that some Reform rabbis go to Rwanda and instantly convert a million people," Ravits said, referring to the liberal religious conversion policies of Judaism's Reform branch. [H: How many of you out-of-work people ever considered going to rich, prosperous-on-your-tax-money, thriving, Israel? You can maintain JOINT (DUAL) CITIZENSHIP AND EVERYTHING!! SOUNDS LIKE A GOOD APPROACH TO ME--BECAUSE IN AMERICA YOU KNOW THAT YOU CAN PROVE JEWISH BLOOD-LINE-EASILY, BECAUSE OF THE FANTASTIC OPEN BORDER POLICY TO JEWS ALL ALONG THE WAY. HOW ABOUT A NICE EXPENSE-PAID VACATION TRIP TO ISRAEL? YOU SEE, THERE IS SO MUCH WELFARE FOR THE TALMUDIC ZIONISTS THAT YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO WORK OR ANYTHING--THE FEES ARE PAID BY THE U.S.! IF YOU HAVE THE TIME--GO CHECK IT OUT AND CONSIDER A RESPITE UNDER THE HOLY-LAND SKY--THE TRIP WOULD DO YOU GOOD!] Although Israel has a virtual monopoly of the more conservative Orthodox stream, the Law of Return also recognizes Reform CONVERSIONS. [Emphasis added.]
Readers, I and my secretary are continually called liars and bigots and every other bad name you can conjure. How so? Because I bring you that which is offered about your globe?? I don't have to go forth into the "universe" to find invisible stories to lay on you--if these be LIES--WHOSE LIES ARE THEY?? I AM BUT AN INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER!! SO BE IT.
ZIONISTS AND GLOBALISTS AND ENFORCERS (MISHPUKA)
"Ah, but that is across the world in Israel and doesn't affect me"! Oh? Well how about THIS ONE?
ROCKEFELLER AND MASS MURDER
The New Federalist, Vol. VIII, NO. 31 (Front page), August 22, 1994:
The Rockefeller Foundation is the prime sponsor of public relations for the United Nations' drastic depopulation program, which the world is invited to accept at the UN's scheduled September conference in Cairo, Egypt.
Evidence in the possession of a growing number of researchers in America, England, and Germany demonstrates that the Foundation and its corporate, medical, and political associates organized the racial mass murder PROGRAM OF NAZI GERMANY. [H: Keep this in mind as you read on--for "Globalist" is also a term for "Zionists"!]
These GLOBALISTS, who function as a conduit for British Empire geopolitics, were not stopped after World War II the United Nations alliance of the old Nazi rightwing with the New Age leftwing poses an even graver danger to the world today than the same grouping did in 1941. [H: Confused? Don't be--THEY ARE ALL PART AND PARCEL OF THE SAME GOAL. Remember, this SAME BUNCH financed the wars as well as setting the policies--then and NOW. THESE ARE THE WOULD-BE-KINGS AND DICTATORS OF YOUR WORLD. So, what am "I" going to do about it? Absolutely nothing more than this--let you in on the secrets as they become public! If you don't like the plight--you fight! Not me, good readers--it is NOT MY PROBLEM!]
The Foundation's money created the medical specialty known as Psychiatric Genetics. [H: Nervous??? And--they did (do) it TAX-FREE!]. For the new experimental field, the Foundation reorganized medical teaching in Germany, creating and thenceforth continuously directing the "Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry" and the "Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity". The Rockefellers' chief executive of these institutions was the fascist Swiss psychiatrist ERNST RUDIN, assisted by his protégés OTMAR VERSCHUER and FRANZ J. KALLMANN.
In 1932, the British-led "Eugenics" movement designated the Rockefellers' Dr. Rudin as the president of the worldwide Eugenics Federation. The movement called for the killing or sterilization of people whose heredity made them a public burden.
THE RACIAL LAWS
A few months later, Hitler took over Germany and the Rockefeller-Rudin apparatus became a section of the Nazi state. The regime appointed Rudin head of the Racial Hygiene Society. Rudin and his staff, as part of the Task Force of Heredity Experts chaired by SS Chief Heinrich Himmler, drew up the sterilization law. Described as an American Model law, it was adopted in July 1933 and proudly printed in the September 1933 Eugenical News (USA) with Hitler's signature. The Rockefeller group drew up other race laws, also based on existing Virginia statutes. Otmar Verschuer and his assistant Josef Mengele together wrote reports for special courts which enforced Rudin's racial purity law against cohabitation of Aryans and non-Aryans. [H: Zionists may well denounce "Aryans" but in actuality the only DEFINITION ACCEPTABLE OF "ARYAN" IS "WHITE" AND THE ZIONIST JEWS ALL CLAIM TO BE OF THE SO-CALLED WHITE-RACE. THAT, OF COURSE, IS CONTINUALLY BURIED IN THE CONFUSION.]
THE "T4" UNIT OF THE HITLER CHANCERY, BASED ON PSYCHIATRISTS LED BY RUDIN AND HIS STAFF, COOPERATED IN CREATING PROPAGANDA FILMS TO SELL MERCY KILLING (EUTHANASIA) TO GERMAN CITIZENS. THE PUBLIC REACTED ANTAGONISTICALLY; HITLER HAD TO WITHDRAW A TEAR-JERKER RIGHT-TO-DIE FILM FROM THE MOVIE THEATERS. THE PROPER GROUNDWORK HAD NOT YET BEEN LAID.
Under the Nazis, the German chemical company I.G. FARBEN and ROCKEFELLER's Standard Oil of New Jersey were effectively a single firm, merged in hundreds of cartel arrangements. I.G. Farben was led up until 1937 by the WARBURG family, Rockefeller's partner in banking and in the design of Nazi German eugenics.
Following the German invasion of Poland in 1939, Standard Oil pledged to keep the merger with I.G. Farben going even if the U.S. entered the war. This was exposed in 1942 by Sen. Harry Truman's investigating committee, and President Roosevelt took hundreds of legal measures during the war to stop the Standard-I.G. Farben cartel from supplying the enemy war machine.
IN 1940-41, I.G. FARBEN BUILT A GIGANTIC FACTORY AT AUSCHWITZ, POLAND TO UTILIZE THE STANDARD OIL-I.G. FARBEN PATENTS WITH CONCENTRATION CAMP SLAVE LABOR. STANDARD-GERMANY PRESIDENT EMIL HELFFERICH TESTIFIED AFTER THE WAR THAT STANDARD OIL FUNDS HELPED PAY FOR SS GUARDS AT AUSCHWITZ. [H: Still with me, little dreamers???]
In 1940, six months after the notorious Standard-I.G. meeting, European Rockefeller Foundation official Daniel O'Brian wrote to the Foundation's chief medical officer Alan Gregg that "it would be unfortunate if it was chosen to stop research which has no relation to war issues"--so the Foundation continued financing Nazi "psychiatric research" during the war.
In 1936, Rockefeller's Dr. Franz Kallmann interrupted his study of hereditary degeneracy and emigrated to America because he was half-Jewish. Kallmann went to New York and established the Medical Genetics Department of the New York State Psychiatric Institute. The Scottish Rite of Freemasonry published Kallmann's study of over 1,000 cases of schizophrenia, which tried to prove its hereditary basis. In the book, Kallmann thanked his long time boss and mentor RUDIN.
Kallmann's book, published in 1938 in the USA and Nazi Germany was used by the T4 unit as a rationalization to begin in 1939 the murder of mental patients and various "defective" people, perhaps most of them children. Gas and lethal injections were used to kill 250,000 under this program, in which the staffs for a broader murder program were desensitized and trained.
In 1943, Otmar Verschuer's assistant JOSEPH MENGELE [H: At least HALF-Jew.] was made medical commandant of Auschwitz. As wartime director of Rockefeller's Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity in Berlin, Verschuer secured funds for Mengele's experiments at Auschwitz from the German Research Council (funding coming from circuitous routing from the Rockefeller Foundation). Verschuer wrote a progress report to the Council: "My co-researcher in this research is my assistant the anthropologist and physician Mengele. He is serving as Hauptstuermfueherer and camp doctor in the concentration camp Auschwitz.. With the permission of the Reichsfuehrere SS Himmler, anthropological research is being undertaken on the various racial groups in the concentration camps and blood samples will be sent to my laboratory for investigation".
Mengele prowled the railroad lines leading into Auschwitz, looking for twins--a favorite subject of psychiatric geneticists. On arrival at Mengele's experimental station, twins filled out "a detailed questionnaire from the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute". There were daily drawings of blood for Verschuer's "specific protein" research. Needles were injected into eyes for work on eye color. There were experimental blood transfusions and infections. Organs and limbs were removed, sometimes without anesthetics. Sex changes were attempted. Females were sterilized, males were castrated. Thousands were murdered and their organs, eyeballs, heads, and limbs were sent to Verschuer and the Rockefeller group at the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.
In 1946, Verschuer wrote to the Bureau of Human Heredity in London, asking for help in continuing his "scientific research".
In 1947, the Bureau of Human Heredity moved from London to Copenhagen. The new Danish building for this was built with Rockefeller money. The first International Congress in Human Genetics following World War II was held at this Danish Institute in 1956. By that time, Verschuer was a member of the American Eugenics Society, then indistinguishable from Rockefeller's Population Council.
Dr. Kallmann helped save Verschuer by testifying in his denazification proceedings. Dr. Kallmann created the American Society of Human Genetics, which organized the "Human Genome Project"--a current $3 BILLION physical multiculturalism effort. Kallmann was a DIRECTOR of the American Eugenics Society in 1952 and from 1954 to 1965. [H: What a small world!]
In the 1950s, the Rockefellers reorganized the U.S. eugenics movement in their own family offices, with spinoff population-control and abortion groups. The Eugenics Society changed its name to the Society for the Study of Social Biology, its current name.
[H: A good question to ask RONN JACKSON is: "What about world depopulation and population control?"]
The Rockefeller Foundation had long financed the eugenics movement in England, apparently repaying Britain for the fact that British capital and an Englishman-partner had started old John D. Rockefeller out in his Oil Trust. In the 1960s, the Eugenics Society of England adopted what they called Crypto-eugenics, stating in their official reports that they would do eugenics through means and instruments not labeled as eugenics.
With support from the Rockefellers, the Eugenics Society (England) set up a sub-committee called the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which for 12 years had no other address than the Eugenics Society.
This, then, is the private, international apparatus which has set the world up for a global holocaust, under the UN flag.
* * *
What do we have here? We have the SAME people as would destroy your Constitution, bring about this New World Enslavement and human life manipulation--RULING AND RUNNING EVERYTHING FROM GOVERNMENT TO YOUR PENDING DEATH!
GOOD LUCK, WORLD!
Gyeorgos Ceres Hatonn,
September 1, 1994
Year 8, Day 16.
REC #2 HATONN
TUE., AUG. 9, 1994 11:09 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 358
TUE., AUG. 9, 1994
We are going to continue straight away with more on The Usurpers, specifically Clark Clifford.
I need to tell you that Rick has done a lot of investigating and is now told that Medford Evans is deceased. We will find a way to take his work and update it FOR him when Jackson is free to do so. That was a major project requested be done, by Jackson, and we honor that intent. Men give their lives to their nation and citizens only to pass on before realizing the value of their service. May we begin to allow these past pioneers in truth never to be lost to the memory and honor of mankind.
Western Islands (publishers), Belmont, Massachusetts 02178, 1968.
Patriots everywhere were heartened last fall to learn that Secretary of Defense McNamara was going to leave the post of Secretary of Defense. Even if the World Bank job means a promotion into the stratosphere, it was welcome news that we would be rid of his disarming guile down here in the troposphere where we have to breathe. We breathed more easily in the Holiday Season of 1967. The interval between McNamara's promised resignation and the appointment of his successor was like a political bombing pause.
Then on January 19, 1968, just four days before the Pueblo incident, the President named to succeed McNamara the fabulous Washington lawyer and adviser of Presidents, Clark Clifford. Some who know something about Clifford felt a little chill when they heard the news. Johnson's dilemma was that if he chose somebody as disarming as McNamara, then the defense situation would continue to deteriorate; but if he chose someone who looked like an improvement then Johnson himself would stand to benefit politically.
Clifford is what they call personable. It is startling, and somehow not reassuring to think of the sinister Walt Rostow, Abe Fortas with his lidded toughness and glabrous Dean Rusk being joined by someone who looks like a gentleman.
Clark Clifford not only looks like a gentleman, he quite obviously is one. Then how explain his intimate association with Johnson? How explain that he got his start to power as an aide to Harry Truman?
Clifford is evidently more than just a gentleman. Cardinal Newman has explained that a hero need not be a gentleman, and certainly the converse holds, that a gentleman need not be a hero. Clark Clifford must be something of both. He endured Harry Truman, he endures Lyndon Johnson, for a reason. David Lilienthal [H: Not to be confused with Alfred M. Lilienthal of whom we will speak later on a different subject, the paradox of anthropological fact--regarding Christians, Hebrew-Israelites, Jews and bloodline.] has revealed in his Journals some of Clifford's feelings and thoughts about Truman that Clifford himself, being a gentlemen, would never have published. That he told Lilienthal what he felt and thought about his White House boss does not mean he was no gentleman; it simply means that he was not a completely loyal friend to Truman, though it seems altogether possible that Truman thought he was loyal. You are not to suppose that Clifford said anything crude about the President; he simply told Lilienthal things which tended to confirm reservations that the AEC, former TVA chairman already had about the man from Independence. "Some of these things", Lilienthal writes, "go, or may go, beyond what I had in mind, and may confirm the feeling of quite a few liberals that Truman does not understand the world at all, and is no liberal by any definition". (Journals, Vol. II, p. 434.) This conversation took place December 9, 1948, a little over a month after the legendary victory of Truman over Dewey, which we now understand Clifford engineered. Apparently he wasn't very proud of himself. "Clark seemed tired and very thoughtful", writes Lilienthal:
He spoke in a worried tone--quite unusual for him--about the conflict within the President's own political family about future policy... spoke of the awful exhibition one sees around the White House of self-seeking, etc.... spoke of the dangers of being in the midst of such great power and influence, and its effect on people, adding, "Every once in a while I notice it in myself, and I try to drag it out in the open".
I don't think Clifford meant to drag it out in the open as completely as Lilienthal has done. Perhaps Clark Clifford will remember in 1968 the ethical worries he had after engineering a Democratic victory in 1948, and vowing not to do that again! But the signs are not hopeful.
After Truman's victory Clifford moved to a penthouse suite across Lafayette Square where he made $500,000 a year selling his knowledge of the executive branch in general and the White House in particular--all based on the most intimate association with Harry Truman. Even a gentleman has to eat.
For all his suavity and finesse, Clark Clifford is as American as the Cardinals. His father was an official of the Missouri Pacific Railroad, an uncle on his mother's side was editor of the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. One has the feeling that Clifford, who took his law degree at Washington University in St. Louis, is a rare type--a financially and intellectually qualified American who didn't go to an Ivy League university simply because he had too much youthful aplomb to care whether he went to one or not. As always with a gentleman, the ability to forgo such an advantage with composure is worth more than the advantage itself. He married a Miss Kimball, of Boston, whom he met on a European tour. Along with such elegant Yankee connections Clifford perfected what a writer for The New York Times Magazine calls an "old-school Southern manner", which indeed is as typical of one side of St. Louis as Anheuser-Bush is of another. One of his most important friends was James K. Vardaman Jr., son of the "racist" Mississippi governor and United States Senator. Throughout the 1930s and into the 1940s Clifford practiced law in one of the best firms in St. Louis. The Clifford name was added as a partner in 1938. Depression was some-thing that happened to other people. Clifford worked hard; he was able to work hard. He was a success; he was a family man, with three children.
Clifford's big break, like that of many another American, most of them not so lucky, came during World War II. His wife and children gave him draft deferment, but in 1944 he applied for and got a commission in the Naval Reserve, Lieutenant, Junior Grade. Staff work in supply on the West Coast got him to Lieutenant Commander by the end of the war. Then, after the war he made it to Captain. Perhaps his acquaintance with Vardaman had helped. Vardaman had gone to Annapolis, but was a graduate of Millsaps College in Jackson, and had served in the Army in World War I (he was twelve years older than Clifford) had received a commission in the U.S. Naval Reserve in 1939 and quickly advanced to Commodore--the equivalent of Brigadier General--was in charge of the St. Louis Office of Naval Intelligence at the time the United States entered World War II. With courage and competence reminiscent of his father, who had made a fighting name for himself in the Spanish-American War, Vardaman racked up an impressive combat record from North Africa to Okinawa, and in May 1945 was recognized by his friend Harry Truman and made Naval Aide to the President. Vardaman in turn had Clark Clifford assigned as aide to the Aide, and on Vardaman's elevation in January 1946 to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Clifford became Truman's Naval Aide. This position was converted, when the youngish lawyer donned "civvies" again to the post of Special Counsel to the President. In this role he made a little history.
The first thing of importance which, at Truman's request, Clifford undertook when settled in the White House in 1946 was to write the first bill unifying the armed services of the United States. On the face of it, this seems like an estimable thing, suffering no whit from the fact that more than twenty years later he would succeed to the enormously powerful office of Secretary of Defense created in his own legal imagination in 1946-1947. The Clark Clifford of 1946 was helped in his job of drafting a military unification bill by the fact that he had so recently been a Navy Captain. This was a help because it was the Navy which opposed unification of the services. The Navy could see the Army taking over, absorbing the Marine Corps and Naval Air, keeping the Air Force, taking every advantage of the largely landlubber civilian population's tendency to use the very word "army" as a synonym for the armed services as a whole.
The Army could see the same thing. The Army liked what it saw. At least General Marshall did. George Marshall, World War II Chief of Staff for the Army, had made his position clear at a luncheon May 9, 1945, at the home of the then Secretary of the Navy James Forrestal, where Admiral Ernest J. King and Presidential adviser Harry Hopkins were also present. According to Forrestal's published Diaries, Marshall said that he was "unshakably committed to the thesis of a single civilian Secretary with a single military Chief of Staff". Truman was putty in Marshall's hands, and in December 1945 sent a message to Congress asking for the kind of unification the Army wanted, or the kind Marshall said it wanted. Congressional and public debate over unification lasted a year and a half. In the Summer of 1946 Forrestal threatened to resign. His objection was to "the Army's view of a single Department, a one-man boss or nabob who is to be the supreme military civilian in the government". (The Forrestal Diaries, p. 202.)
Interestingly enough, the first Secretary of Defense to become in fact such a "nabob" was McNamara. But that kind of idea was evidently in Marshall's mind all along. What Forrestal calls the "Army view" was the view of Marshall and company. And Marshall's "company" was not limited to Army men. Plenty of Army men would have been glad to leave the Navy be.
Nevertheless, at the top echelons the Army represented the push for a consolidated command of all services, the Navy stood for autonomy of the services with new machinery for coordination. All this was parallel with the age-old political struggle between central government and states' rights. Some kind of compromise was inevitable if any unification legislation was to get through Congress; the passing of the first unification law in 1947, setting up the "National Military Establishment" depended on concessions to the Navy. Not the least concession was marking Navy Secretary Forrestal down for the proposed job of Secretary of Defense. This was in no sense a bribe in Forrestal's mind, for he had no personal reason to want a job, the burden of which he could anticipate better than perhaps anyone else. It was some kind of advance reassurance to the Navy and everyone else who feared overcentralization. For all who knew Forrestal knew that he would not use the office to build an empire, would not be totalitarian in his methods, would not act from any motive but patriotism. And perhaps it was for this that he finally had to die--or be killed.
A far less conspicuous bit of inducement for the Navy was the fact that Clifford, so recently, if briefly, a Navy Captain, was selected as the lawyer to draw up the bill. Few people, including Congressmen, actually read proposed legislation. But people who consider themselves somewhat on the "inside" like to know who is really back of a bill, and who is writing it, and then they feel ready to make a decision on it. Truman said in September 1946 that he was going to have the bill "drawn in his office by Clark Clifford and Admiral Leahy". (The Forrestal Diaries, p. 204.) With that, and the eventual word that Forrestal would be the top civilian over all the military, how could the Navy and its friends hold back?
It would be an absurd oversimplification to suppose that Clark Clifford or anyone else in 1946-1947 foresaw how the unification plan of 1947 and the second reorganization of 1949, which changed the name "National Military Establishment" to "Department of Defense", could lead to the school-teacherish, anti-military civilian establishment which is the Pentagon of the 1960s. We have had nine Secretaries of Defense these past twenty-one years. The first one, Forrestal, was frustrated and destroyed--partly perhaps, because of his critical position on Palestine, in which he clashed with, among others, Clifford; but mainly, no doubt, because of his militant anti-Communism in which he clashed with all the crypto-Communists; but also partly because he was simply alien to the trend toward a purely "businesslike" control of the armed services.
A businessman himself, Forrestal knew that a sovereign nation is not just a merchant. A businessman, as such, has to deal with somebody. A businessman figures it is bad business to fight. He must deal. Now this philosophy is all right in the business world. It is a valuable adjunct in the supply functions of the military. But it is fatal in a commander of fighting men. There was historically tragic irony in Truman's message to Congress on unification in December 1945. He said so truly that "the future peace of the world will depend in large part upon whether or not the United States... is willing to maintain the physical strength necessary to act as a safeguard against any future aggressor". And at the time he said this, Truman was actually launching a reorganization of our armed services based on ideas of the financial, legal, and intellectual Establishment which could only destroy all fighting spirit, and based on ideas which did actually lead, eventually, to the reductio ad absurdum of a modern manager, Robert McNamara. McNamara would not fight anybody except American generals and admirals, and he fought them to keep them from fighting anybody else. He may have regarded Vietnam as a safety valve--the generals and admirals could fight a containment war against the Viet Cong and Ho Chi Minh without actually getting anywhere. The essential thing was not to fight Russia, but to deal. And to help the deal, disarm.
We cannot say that Clark Clifford anticipated in 1946-1947 that there would be a McNamara in 1961-1968. But the unification bill which he drafted was in historical fact the legal foundation for a defense establishment which, while appealing to economy and the need for preventing aggression, has actually for twenty years cost ever-increasing billions of dollars. At the same time it has either retreated before aggression, as in Central Europe and Cuba, or fought just enough to make the Communists look good, as in Korea and Vietnam.
And whatever Clark Clifford could foresee in 1946-1947, he could see everything that was happening during the McNamara years of 1961-1968, and by his position as intimate adviser to both Kennedy and Johnson he shared responsibility for the whole McNamara fiasco. The extent of that fiasco is yet to be fully revealed, but it includes more than enough American humiliations--from the Bay of Pigs to the capture of the Pueblo.
"The New Defense Secretary Thinks Like the President", is the title of an article in The New York Times Magazine (Jan. 28, 1968) about Clark Clifford. If that is so, and if Clifford has been the intimate adviser that all say he has been, then he must share responsibility with Johnson for McNamara's record. McNamara has contained, confused, frustrated, and in global terms neutralized the most expensive armed services in history (it would be absurd to go on calling them "the most powerful armed services"). Power is as power does, and the U.S. Navy does not protect itself even against North Korea.
The operational disarmament of the United States is a long and intricate process. It will not be complete until our nuclear stockpiles have been transferred to the custody and for the use of the United Nations Peace Force. To that end a community of politically-oriented scientists and scientifically suggestible politicians have labored for years, and still labor. M. Stanton Evans, who calls them "The Disarmament Lobby" and has skillfully analyzed them in his book The Politics of Surrender, made the following summary statement on the Manion Forum in January 1968:
Our disarmament theoreticians hold to the idea that there is a balance of terror in the Cold War in which both the United States and the Soviet Union are open to strategic attack. The theoreticians think, surprisingly, that this is a good thing. They like for both sides to be exposed to attack because this creates the right psychological climate for disarmament negotiations--as long as everybody is scared to death of being blown up by nuclear weapons, there will be much more public receptivity to the idea of getting disarmed.
We must realize that all of this constitutes a campaign in the field of psychological warfare--war by the "Disarmament Lobby" against the American public. It is in the minds of the public that the theoreticians want "both sides to be exposed to attack". Actually, it is not conceivable that either side is really exposed to nuclear attack--unless the American military should get out of control! The "theoreticians" whom Evans mentions (Jerome Wiesner and Walt Rostow are probably the two most important) depend, successfully to date, on firm control of the generals and admirals from the E ring of the Pentagon, or from the White House. While that control lasts, there will be no nuclear holocaust. (At this point I seem to be arguing for the control, since I am certainly as much against a nuclear holocaust as either Norman Cousins or Bertrand Russell but read on).
No other country will attack the United States with nuclear weapons, for that would risk possible retaliation from our incalculably superior stockpile. At the same time it has long been psychologically and politically impossible for the United States to attack any other country with nuclear weapons.
For twenty years our armed services have been in an impossible situation. The Pueblo incident is a glaring illustration, and easy to see because it is so small a part of the whole picture. When our "trawler" was threatened it would have been natural for fighting craft--ships and planes--to come to its rescue. Two things prevented such a logical solution: (1) The Pueblo was under the personal command of Robert McNamara, the antimilitary Secretary of Defense 7,000 miles away in Washington, so that regular Navy and Air Force commanders were not authorized to interfere with whatever was going on, and (2) fighting planes within striking distance when the word was finally received were armed exclusively with nuclear weapons, but nuclear weapons cannot be used for any purpose without explicit orders from the President.
Jack Anderson, of all people, wrote from Seoul, February 7, 1968, "The nuclear armaments, of course, give these few fighters tremendous firepower. In theory, this is supposed to provide our 50,000 ground troops in Korea with adequate air protection and still free a maximum number of planes to fight in Vietnam".
In theory. In practice, however, a plane which is armed only with nuclear weapons when nuclear weapons are effectively prohibited is an unarmed, or disarmed plane!
Throughout the world, our Army, Navy, and Air Force are as helpless in a major crisis as is a policeman or National Guardsman in a riot who has been given strict orders not to fire, or to fire only blanks.
The basic authority for maintaining our armed services in this impossible situation goes back twenty years to the Truman Administration, to a historic decision made in the White House in July 1948 by Harry Truman himself--at a time when Clark Clifford was Truman's other self, his alter ego. From June to November 1948 Clifford's influence with Truman was at a peak. This was no accident. Patrick Anderson, in The New York Times Magazine for January 28, 1968, tells how "Clifford emerged as the leader of a group of liberals within the Administration who met weekly to plan how they could influence Truman's course of action". Oscar Chapman and Leon Keyserling were in the group, certainly qualified Liberals. Anderson quotes Clifford directly:
The idea was that six or eight of us would try to come to an understanding among ourselves on what direction we would like the President to take on any given issue. Then, quietly and unobtrusively [it's such a help to be a gentleman!], each in his own way, we would try to steer the President in that direction. Most of the Cabinet and the Congressional leaders were urging Mr. Truman to go slow, to veer a little closer to the conservative line. ...
Well, it was two forces fighting for the mind of the President, that's really what it was. It was completely unpublicized, and I don't think Mr. Truman ever realized it was going on (Italics added).
An appalling confession, but very instructive. The President of the United States, sitting there in the limelight, and all these psychological warfare guerillas "quietly and unobtrusively" trying to ambush his mind! Sort of makes you think of wolves circling the campfire.
Well, Clifford and his group won, as Clifford's key role in the election campaign was to prove. What you and I are concerned with right now is that it was just at the peak of Clark Clifford's ascendancy over Truman that Truman effectively disarmed the armed services of the United States of the nuclear weapons which, ever since, they have needed more and had less chance to use. As Doctor Julius Robert Oppenheimer so aptly said, "An atomic bomb which you do not use is of no use to you".
Truman's unreasonable decision was made in response to a very reasonable request from Secretary of Defense Forrestal. The Summer of 1948 was the summer of the first Berlin crisis, when the Soviets closed off ground access to West Berlin, and in due course the United States and Great Britain responded with the famous airlift of necessary daily supplies. For a time there was intense fear of general war--not "nuclear holocaust", for the legend of Soviet nuclear capability had not yet been born, but massive land warfare with countless Red Army divisions overrunning Western Europe unless the United States could deter them with a "credible" threat of using the atomic bomb. It was well known that, having demobilized so frantically after World War II, we had in the Summer of 1948 little military strength except the atomic bomb, then deliverable by B-29 bombers. What was not well known, but was a fact, was that we had little or no atomic strength either, for the nuclear production lines which would by the mid 1950s give us U-235 and plutonium in great abundance, and a variety of bomb mechanisms to utilize these materials, were in 1948 the disorderly playthings of Left-oriented or pacifist-minded scientists.
Still, even a marginal atomic stockpile was, in the world of 1948, an immensely formidable resource--if its use could be credibly threatened. And it could be. The interminable propaganda about fallout and holocaust, through it had been pouring out of the laboratories and off the presses for three years, had had almost no effect as yet on the public consciousness. In September 1948 some twenty leading newspaper publishers of the nation met at the home of the late Philip Graham with Secretary Forrestal, General George Marshall (who was then Secretary of State), General Omar Bradley, Robert A. Lovett, and Chip Bohien to talk about the Berlin crisis. Forrestal recorded in his diary that there was "unanimous agreement that in the event of war the American people would not only have no question as to the propriety of the use of the atomic bomb, but would in fact expect it to be used." (The Forrestal Diaries, p. 488.)
REC #1 HATONN
WED., AUG. 10, 1994 9:40 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 359
WED., AUG. 10, 1994
JUST HOLD A LITTLE LONGER, FRIENDS
Well, the interesting barrage of material has surfaced from Mr. Green et al. regarding many things--but interestingly enough the 2.5 million dollars pledged to FIGHT THESE CASES AGAINST "THEM" IS IN POINT!
At this time I think you can all understand that we have now acquired three sources who offer that kind of loan for funding legal fees. I DID NOT SAY TO PAY OFF OPPONENTS--I SAID FOR "LEGAL DEFENSE". As a matter of fact, the funds were to be stored in the Institute and backed by gold as are all funds and notes--but at present it is not yet put anywhere until the hounds are pulled off.
Mr. Horton (of Green) is pulling every dirty legal trick in the book to get a default judgment regarding the gold--WHILE THE INSTITUTE IS WITHOUT ATTORNEY SUPPORT. I THINK THERE ARE ABOUT TO BE SOME BIG SURPRISES!
Mr. Green tells "everyone" that he placed the gold he took with the court. NO, he was ORDERED to deliver the gold to the court and, as a matter of fact, the Institute is paying the costs of the gold for holding, in the court. That should tell all of you WHO the gold actually belongs to--and it is not Mr. Green.
What is planned for little "Contact"? LOTS! Our little handful of people cannot handle such a massive chore as publishing this paper--solely. The plans are, readers, to (not us) set up an entire network which will allow publication on a regular basis (timing to be established) in EVERY major city, Canada, Mexico and points of the four directions. Cmdr. Russbacher is already making arrangements for connection in Europe and Mr. Jackson and colleagues (some of them from the Committee itself) HERE. Remember that Capt. Russbacher was set free yesterday. It does not mean that he was sitting doing nothing while waiting. He is exactly WHO he claims to be, AS IS RONN JACKSON. They simply have not (wisely so) advertised!!
Will the miserable assaults sustained by Dharma, etc., be worth the results? No--because no results can ever heal completely the scars of these battles and insults against the being. The soul is not injured so all else is of little consequence in your journey--but the lessons had to be confronted and learned--and experience is often the ONLY REAL teacher. But no--in the physical expression the physical rewards never offset the rememberings--only the persistence and perception become the worthy measure of TRUTH.
The point becomes focused on the allowance of evil intent, corruption, thievery and such to win just because the legal system is also corrupted and is not "just". NO--it is not! This is WHY the battle continues beyond the value of the objects in point--because it is NOT ALRIGHT for your systems to be so dastardly that this can be allowed to happen.
George may well claim to have taken the gold to get it from Ekkers or whatever else he claims (ten different stories)--but the MAN WHO GAVE THE GOLD TO THE INSTITUTE (WHICH BELONGS TO ALL OF YOU PARTICIPANTS) SAYS HE GAVE IT TO THE INSTITUTE--ONLY HAD TO SEND IT TO GREEN BECAUSE IT WAS THE ONLY ADDRESS HE WAS GIVEN! EKKERS WON'T EVEN SEE THE GOLD, READERS--IT WAS AND IS INTENDED FOR THE INSTITUTE. NO, IT IS NOT ALRIGHT THAT GREEN TOOK IT AND THEN REMOVED IT TO NEVADA AND BURIED IT IN HIS YARD--IT IS NOT RIGHT!
You will find as this unfolds that the Institute OFFERED to, early on, give Mr. Green sufficient to pay his legal fees, etc., FROM THE GOLD. He got furious and hung up on Mr. Dixon. Now, he says the Ekkers (Institute) did not honor their agreement. Ekkers have NOTHING to do with it--this money BELONGS TO THE INSTITUTE AS A FUNDAMENTAL ASSET! THE INSTITUTE IS A VALID, WELL-RUN AND OPERATING CORPORATION ABIDING BY CORPORATE LAWS.
If the Institute was originally intended by Mr. Green to be some kind of a "PONZI" scheme, as Mr. Green now tells the Associated Press--HE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT INTENTION AS IT WAS HIS PLAN--HE WAS A DIRECTOR AND FOUNDER OF SAME. It has not been run except as an honorable and well-managed institution--investigated by every Federal agency right through the FBI--thanks to the tales and demands of Mr. Green. Always the hope of Green was to destroy the Ekkers AND THE INSTITUTE before YOU PEOPLE could stand the battle. We shall see.
Mr. Green has told everyone that "I" went with him to Nevada and left ones here. Well, if I am so "bad" or "unreal"--why would he offer such lies?? Is there not confusion offered here?
PHONE CALLS ON STOLEN NUMBERS
We have been informed that a person FROM VIRGINIA WAS SENT TO TEHACHAPI WITH THAT PHONE NUMBER TO SET UP THE PEOPLE HERE! How interesting? One of those calls was the ONE that gave away the perpetrator--by the residence phone number!!! Just thought you inquiring minds would like to know! No, I won't give the information yet--I will let the investigators release it. I will remind you that surveillance teams tagged our people here quite a while back and denied doing so. The Police said it was someone ALSO from Virginia. Still interesting...? You ask "if there are connections"? The point is not IF--it is simply HOW BIG!
At this point, however, I simply ask Mike and Rick to get letters of intent from the parties with the legal backup. We do not need the loan agreements--or, produce them, I care not which. A statement "letter" of intent is sufficient and might well give great comfort to the new attorney's coming into the cases as well. As a matter of fact, I would like the same agreement put to paper from Mike--who will also be arranging for massive funding quite soon now. I don't believe the players in these cases have any idea of the depth of their opponent--but twittering over E.T.s is also about to cease!
The interesting debate and argument from "everyone" about Gunther and Ronn is that "nobody can find out anything so they are liars and con-men!" Oh? I don't think so, good buddies and the last laugh is yet to come!!!! I would further tell you that just from "Fat Lady Singing" is plenty to fight every legal battle from now to Armageddon when the Certificates are forced into the honoring--and I am not speaking of Dare Schaut OR Treasurygate!
This party just seems to continue to annoy ones. I am accused, along with Dharma, of plagiarizing books and publishing it. Good grief, readers, the books in point dealt with Germain (those in REAL question). Dharma doesn't have much of anything to do with any of them, except to type them. George Green even shows copyrights as "publisher" of the material. Could the wrong parties be hooded and on the scaffolding? So be it.
Germain is about to enter the picture though, ISN'T HE, MR. JACKSON? Funny thing, though, Mr. Jackson doesn't like much of Germain's routines for accomplishments. He will get used to them I would guess! Ronn also suggests that I (Hatonn) just come right on out and tell a few things which I skirt constantly. No, I don't think so, for I still have a bit of "breaking gently" to do. We will just move right on with the USURPERS so that readers continue to get background of power-players. The "players", including the ones of whom I reference--KNOW ME WELL. I would not like to spoil such a nice relationship. Thank you.
Along those lines of focus, may we move on with Clark Clifford, please. I have to take time, readers, to give insight to Dharma as we move along for she is the brunt of the battle--the Elite have REALLY wanted to silence her and, according to Jackson--they have come REALLY CLOSE! THAT is not a wise thing to continue much longer because I am getting pretty "testy".
There is NOTHING which says you (any of you) have to so much as look at a single word we write--so it's rather a funny thing that this CONTACT "rag sheet" has become THE paper of the centuries. Twitter, deny--anything you wish--that is NOT my business. When I speak personally to someone(s)--remember something--this paper was for communications between my crew members and it is our business what is placed therein. It has had a purpose which perhaps can begin to be changed in directions--but just as I stay out of YOUR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT--please understand OUR POINTS--FOR WE HAVE NO GROUPS, CHURCHES, CULTS OR ANYTHING ELSE.
Let us now turn our attention back to our subject in progress.
Western Islands (publishers), Belmont,
Massachusetts 02178, 1968.
General Marshall once told Forrestal that John Foster Dulles had told him: "The American people would execute you if you did not use the bomb in the event of war". That today's surface attitude is hysterically opposite to that is due to: (1) continuation of "ban the bomb" propaganda by intellectuals in the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE) and other "Liberal" organizations, (2) acceptance by the public (though not without some inner reservations) of the myth of Soviet nuclear might, (3) endorsement by the government and the Establishment of the theory of "nuclear stalemate". Only the first of these factors was in operation in 1948, and even that not successfully. In England, too, Clement Attlee told Forrestal that "there is no division in the British public mind about the use of the atomic bomb--they were for its use. Even the Church in recent days had publicly taken this position." (The Forrestal Diaries, p. 491.)
Considering, then, that the United States might have to take serious military action in Europe in 1948, that it could not possibly take such action except by use or credible threat of the atomic bomb; and considering the fact that on the home front the American people expected the bomb to be used militarily if need arose, Secretary of Defense James Forrestal was completely justified in requesting of President Truman that custody of the atomic bomb be transferred from the civilian Atomic Energy Commission to the armed services. If the military could not be trusted with our most important military weapon, then they really should be discharged and replaced by men who could be trusted. Talk of "taking the bomb away from the military" is largely empty oratory. It is like "taking the money away from the bankers". Whoever has the money IS the banker. Whoever has the atomic bomb IS the military--at the highest command level. America's military calamities since World War II--deadlock (not to say defeat) in Korea, ineffectiveness in Cuba, humiliation in the Sea of Japan (Pueblo incident), and worst of all, the self-defeating insanity of Vietnam--have all been due basically to the fact that our highest military command, in the sense indicated above--the President, the Secretary of Defense, and their civilian aides--have regarded possession of the atomic bomb as a sacred trust. That sacred trust is to guarantee that the American military in the ordinary sense of that term, the generals and the admirals, the men who do the fighting--do not get their hands on any nuclear weapons that are ready for use. Truman himself said that he did not want "to have some dashing lieutenant colonel decide when would be the proper time to drop one", that he would keep the [Truman] decision in his own hands.
Forrestal's historic request was considered at the White House July 21, 1948 in a confrontation between the National Military Establishment (as the Department of Defense was then called) and the Atomic Energy Commission, of which David E. Lilienthal was chairman. AEC had custody of the bomb. Forrestal was asking that such custody be transferred to NME. Lilienthal spoke against the request. Two days later he decided in favor of Lilienthal. Forrestal wrote in his diary:
He told me that he would make a negative decision on the question of the transfer of custody of atomic bombs and said that political considerations, at the immediate moment, had influenced this decision. He indicated that after election it would be possible to take another look at the picture. (The Forrestal Diaries, p. 461.)
In view of the fact, noted above, that many in authority agreed that the American people were at the time overwhelmingly in favor of military use of the bomb, Truman's invoking of "political considerations" was simply absurd. The American public in 1948 did not know about the fight between Forrestal and Lilienthal, but if they had known one cannot help but feel they would have been on Forrestal's side. The political considerations would have worked the other way.
As for the promise that "after election it would be possible to take another look at the picture", of course no such look--at least none involving, as it should have, any public debate--was ever taken. After election, steps were taken instead to remove Forrestal from office, to drive him crazy and to destroy him. He died, libeled in death as a suicide, in the early morning of May 22, 1949, ten months after his valiant, but futile attempt at the White House to obtain for the United States armed services the crucial weapon of modern times. We cannot dwell further upon the matter here, but study of the facts in the case leaves little room for doubt that Forrestal did not die at his own hand because of despondency over failure to achieve a sound military posture for his country; little room for doubt that he was killed to prevent his trying again, as he surely would have done, and possibly with success. (See The Death of James Forrestal, by Cornell Simpson).
What was the role of Clark Clifford in this parley on the Continental Divide of modern military history? The Chief at whose ear he hovered (when circumstances were propitious, for he had a gentleman's tact) gave the signal for the descent, which has been toward the cities of the plain, which are by a very dead sea. (Genesis 13:12).
Under "civilian control", in the interests of "economy", we have actually spent undreamed-of and ever-increasing billions on a Defense Department which approaches impotence, which is incapable of defending one of our prized floating technological marvels, the elite Pueblo, against the contemptible top minnows of Russia's miserable puppet, the so-called government of North Korea. To what degree and what extent was Clark Clifford, in 1968 Secretary of Defense, responsible in 1948 for Truman's disastrous decision to disarm America?
If we take Clifford's own word for it, his responsibility must have been very great for, as we noted above, he led one of two groups (the victorious one) that as Clifford himself acknowledged were "fighting for the mind of the President". And he added, "I don't think Mr. Truman ever realized it was going on".
Clifford's influence on Truman was at all times very great, but as of July 1948 it was at a peak, for it was the summer of the Democratic Convention at which Harry Truman's nomination was opposed by the Dixiecrats and by the ultra-Liberal Americans for Democratic Action (ADA)--while Clark Clifford, Louis Johnson, and one or two others stuck with Truman. Clifford did considerably more than "stick". He planned the campaign which was to end victoriously. Too bad he wasn't as ruthless against Russia as he was against Tom Dewey. At any rate, Harry Truman must have trusted Clark Clifford a great deal at that time of the world's day.
Nevertheless, strategically placed as he was, and Schemer that he is, Clifford was not a prime mover in the decision to deny the armed services custody of their main weapon. The prime movers in this, as in everything relating to atomic energy, were the politically organized atomic scientists, of whom the most important was Julius Robert Oppenheimer, the Communists-serving atomic scientist. The great concern of such scientists after Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to take from the United States military the weapon which they had in the first instance thrust upon the United States military. From August 1945 on, these scientists had seen their own political influence rise in an exponential curve, until as of midsummer 1948 Julius Robert Oppenheimer was probably the most persuasive individual in the power structure of the United States. Oppenheimer was a Schemer to make Clark Clifford and Abe Fortas look like amateurs. To ordinary methods of persuasion he added a hypnotic power. The effect is suggested in Lilienthal's Journals:
Robert Oppenheimer summarized the [General Advisory] Committee's views on the questions we [of the Atomic Energy Commission] submitted to them for their opinion, in an hour's statement that was as brilliant, lively, and accurate a statement as I believe I have ever heard. He is pure genius. Even these great brains [scientists on the GAC] joined in the amazement and delight we all felt with this wonderful piece (p. 186).
Of course, Lilienthal had no way of knowing whether Oppenheimer was "accurate" in all he said or not. That is why I attribute hypnotic powers to Oppenheimer. He made almost everybody believe him, even after he confessed he was a great liar. That seemed to be the only time they didn't believe him, which is possibly what he intended.
Lilienthal was, as of 1948, Oppenheimer's stooge in the political bureaucracy (being less intense and less delicate, he didn't burn out as fast and thus survived the more brilliant Schemer). Lilienthal, in turn, was on excellent terms with Clark Clifford. Not that Oppenheimer would have needed an intermediary to get to Clifford, but Clifford might have needed one to get to Oppenheimer, and might well have valued Lilienthal's acquaintance the more because the latter was in such close organizational relationship with the Mesmer of nuclear physics.
As a cultivated gentleman, with a good education and a superior but not radically inquiring mind, Clark Clifford in 1948 had no more chance of thinking at variance with the line of the atomic scientists than a normal high school girl has in 1968 of wearing a farthingale. Fashion is more imperious in thought than in dress. The kind of Schemer Clifford is, in the world of international nuclear politics, is simply an adjunct to the kind of Schemer Oppenheimer was. The same goes for Lilienthal. Nobody knew this better than these two lawyers. They were happy, of course, that Oppenheimer seemed to be a Liberal of some sort. So were they--Liberals of some sort.
Clifford's role in the "custody" crisis of 1948 was that of expediter. It was in fact a very important, possibly an essential role. For the decision would be made and was made by the un-predictable man from Independence, who was not well enough educated to be reliably influenced directly by an Oppenheimer. Harry Truman was one mystery which Clark Clifford certainly understood better than any nuclear physicist could. Lilienthal again testifies to Clifford's importance:
I thought Clark's influence on the course of the President had been so very, very great because he... had found a language, a terminology, and an atmosphere in which the President could express [his] deep-rooted Populist, insurgent ideas. (Journals, p.434).
Clifford and Truman did indeed speak the same language. At least Clifford understood Truman's language, and Truman thought he understood Clifford's. Clifford was at this time not just an expediter, he was the key expediter of Truman's decisions.
There were others: General George Marshall, James Webb, now head of NASA, then Director of the Bureau of the Budget and like Clifford a favorite with David Lilienthal. There was Lilienthal himself, who understood Truman so much better than Forrestal did. All these men influenced the President. The one with apparently most at stake, the one who directly confronted Forrestal to block the arming of the armed services was Lilienthal. And Lilienthal had word in advance that, assuming his usual adroitness in conference did not fail, he could count on the Presidential backing needed for victory over the Secretary of Defense. He had the word three weeks in advance of the formal meeting at the White House. He had the word from the White House, from Clark Clifford. This is the entry in Lilienthal's Journals:
This morning [June 30, 1948] I had phoned Clifford to say that we were having our [preliminary] meeting with Forrestal today and would he have any further comment on the issue? He hadn't been able to talk to the President about it but would try to before noon.
He phoned at 12:20, but by that time we were at our meeting. I got him back about 2:55 p.m.
He had presented the matter to the President. The President said, "As long as I am in the White House I will be opposed to taking atomic weapons away from the hands they are now in [i.e., Lilienthal's, which is to say Oppenheimer's], and they will only be delivered to the military by particular order of the President issued at a time when they are needed". Clifford said he wasn't surprised but seemed pleased. (Vol. II, pp. 376-377).
And why wouldn't a Master Schemer in such a situation be pleased? For this meant that so long as Harry Truman and Clark Clifford were both in the White House (and when Clifford eventually did leave, early in 1950, he left on his own initiative) atomic bombs would hardly be delivered to the military without the advice of Special Counsel Clark Clifford. Even today, as Secretary of Defense (and into the bargain, again a trusted personal adviser to the President), Clifford's real power in the world could hardly be greater. He had in 1948 won the battle for the mind of the President--perhaps a simpler, perhaps a more basically American mind than those of Clifford's other Presidents, Kennedy and Johnson.
But American as it was, it was not in the interests of the nation when Harry Truman said to Forrestal, Lilienthal, and their respective associates assembled in the presidential office July 21, 1948: "You have got to understand that this isn't a military weapon". (Lilienthal's Journals, Vol. II, p. 391.) Lilienthal was certainly reacting normally when he confided to his diary, "I shall never forget this particular expression". No, I should think not. The atomic bomb is not a military weapon! Of course, as far as any real military purpose is concerned, we have acted upon that astonishing statement these past twenty years. On the other hand, we have persisted in manufacturing these things which may or may not be military weapons, but are certainly nothing else, and we have persisted in training our military personnel to rely upon them, so that in crisis they will turn to them. But then, by policy, those things which were military weapons when the plane or ship was armed are not military weapons when the time comes to fight--and the fighter is unarmed for the battle! No wonder, as Judge Morris said, we are losing.
As a final note on Clifford's role as expediter of the anti-military decision in the custody debate, observe that if he was not the author of Truman's absurd statement to Forrestal that "political considerations" were ruling, he was in the best position of anyone to know just how absurd the statement was, for he was the architect of Truman's political victory. You may be sure the custody issue never got into the campaign.
Truman had ascended to the Presidency on the death of Franklin D. Roosevelt. He had not yet been elected President in his own right.
* * *
We will speak of the election when we again write. Thank you.
REC #2 HATONN
THU., AUG. 11, 1994 10:38 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 360
THU., AUG. 11, 1994
As we sit to write on THE USURPERS this morning let us be glad in that the persons involved in the publication of the book in point have surfaced and we are grateful. We find that Medford has a son, M. Stanton Evans, and he is our next project for recognition and contact.
Ronn Jackson was on the line when the "publisher" called in to speak to Rick and there was a "conference" call in which a lot was covered.
Readers, I can only urge you to keep up with your subscription and--if you are able--get YOUR OWN because these papers are going to CHANGE YOUR WORLD! Our immediate intent is not in PUNISHING past indiscretions in ANY instance--but rather the thrust into changing of that which is at hand and will be coming. Perot made a good statement on Larry King Live long, long ago--to the generalization: "...never mind the covering of immediate or past indiscretions--let us forgive so that we can unite and save our nation..." Is it not better for the criminal in ALL instance to make restitution and rehabilitation than to simply be thrust into a cell at the public's expense for housing and entertainment? You must set your goals, citizens, and rise above the personal focus on your anger, spite, revenge or perceptions. He who has been on the inside DOING WRONG--will know better both the wrongs AND WHAT TO DO TO SET THINGS "RIGHT"! LET US HONOR THOSE WHO WILL CHANGE--FOR THEY SHALL LEAD! SO BE IT--JUDGMENT OF A MAN IS NOT YOURS!
Back to Clark Clifford and The Usurpers so we can move on. Thank you.
THE USURPERS. Part
Continuation from bottom of page 157:
The part that Clifford played in the 1948 election is much better known, was much more obvious at the time, than his role as one of the earliest of one of the least obtrusive members of the Disarmament Lobby. Clifford had recognized in 1947 that his only hope of going anywhere was to help Truman get nominated and elected back to the White House. Though a "Liberal" himself, he did not lose time and face with the ADA's abortive attempts to ditch Harry Truman for some more Rooseveltian image. Liberals and the Democratic Party were, Clifford reasoned, inevitably going to have to take Truman, and they had better make the most of him. In November 1947 this perceptive young lawyer submitted to his Chief a 43-page memorandum on how to get re-elected. That was just what Harry Truman needed, and he had a lot of confidence in Clark Clifford. He had learned, in the words of Patrick Anderson in The New York Times Magazine, "that he and his young adviser shared the same unsentimental view of politics". In other words, they were both very cynical.
Clifford's memo began by recognizing the weaknesses in their position. The Democratic Party, he said, was "fat, tired, and even a little senile". It was "an unhappy alliance of Southern conservatives, Western progressives, and big-city labor". Success would depend on bringing "enough members of these misfit groups to the polls". The candidate, who was also the President, would have to "resort to subterfuge".
Under pretense of official "inspection" tours Truman could campaign even before the conventions; once the candidates were formally announced and the regular campaign season opened, Truman could whistle-stop and give that Republican 79th Congress "hell". Clifford was clear that Truman's greatest asset was combative energy. No use trying to convert him into a smoothie; let Dewey have the suave approach, and suavely go down to defeat. The problem was simply to direct Truman's outbursts against the right targets. The main target was just: Republicans.
In 1948 there were voters who could not remember a Republican Administration; many who could remember the last one (1929-1933) connected it with one thing only: Depression. True, the Democrats had had a war since then, but it was over and we had won it, or thought we had. Korea, corruption, Communism, Bay of Pigs, riots in the streets, Bobby Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Vietnam--all these Democratically tagged calamities were, as of 1948, still in the future.
President Truman's opportunities for unrequited vulgar vituperation were almost unlimited. Just two things really bothered Harry Truman and Clark Clifford: Dixiecrats and Henry Wallace. Clifford had the answers. As for the Dixiecrats, ignore 'em. "It is inconceivable," he wrote, "that any policies initiated by the Truman Administration, no matter how 'liberal' [the quotes around the word are Clifford's], could so alienate the South in the next year that it would revolt. The South could be considered safely Democratic. And in formulating national policy, it can be safely ignored" (Italics added). This was Clark Clifford's one big mistake, and it cost Truman 39 Electoral College votes which went to Dixiecrat candidate Strom Thurmond, but it was not a fatal mistake as far as the election was concerned. Possibly the reason that Clifford misjudged the South was that he is a sort of Southerner himself, being from St. Louis, and assumed that other Southerners were coming to be as free of prejudice and conviction as he was.
In dealing with the Henry Wallace threat, Clifford was much more realistic. He wrote in the memorandum: "Wallace's mysticism has increased while his humility has decreased--so now he has a messianic belief that he is the Indispensable Man. Wallace is gambling for high stakes. He hopes to defeat President Truman by splitting the Democratic party and then inherit its leadership so he can be the candidate in 1952".
The remedy? "Every effort must be made now jointly and at one and the same time--although, of course, by different groups--to dissuade him and also to identify him and isolate him in the public mind with the Communists".
Even Senator Joseph R. McCarthy's enemies have never specifically charged him with anything so cynical as that. Mysticism and Communism are at opposite poles. Wallace was no Communist. Clark Clifford would know this as well as anyone. Yet he did not hesitate to urge a systematic smear of Henry Wallace, and at the same time, working through another group, to plead with Wallace in friendly fashion to withdraw from the contest. No wonder a "high Government official" told Patrick Anderson concerning LBJ: "The President likes to get advice from men like Clark who are cold and shrewd and aren't swayed by moralistic arguments".
Biographer Anderson summarizes: "Clifford's memorandum is a classic political document, and it is one that provides brilliant insight into its author's thinking". Clifford himself, as we noted above, was depressed after the November election and fell to brooding on White House ethics and his own position, confiding his worries to his journal-writing friend David Lilienthal in December 1948.
Fourteen months later, in January 1950, he resigned. The Near Left mourned and eulogized. New Republic: "Clark Clifford's retirement as Special Counsel further weakens Our Side in the White House... Clifford knew the score. In many ways he was the strongest liberal influence in the Presidential entourage". Nation: "Clifford has been the mainstay of the Fair Deal, the author of its best Presidential speeches [how did the Nation know?], and the originator of its most impressive strategies." Southern and other "Conservatives" who just somehow feel that Clifford will be better for our side than McNamara had better reflect that the Nation and the New Republic thought Clif-ford was on their side, and they probably know him better than we do. Many northern "Conservatives" thought at first that McNamara was on our side!
Since 1950, Clark Clifford has made incredible sums as a lawyer by accepting rich corporations as clients and steering them through the treacherous shoals of Washington. Whether it's what you know or who you know, Clifford has the knowledge. More naive Liberals have sometimes thought he has "sold out" to the big corporations. It would be nearer the truth to say they have sold out to him. Not to him personally, of course, but to the "Liberalism" which he accepts. It seems worth observing that when Clark Clifford was in the White House he counseled Harry Truman to fight, to "give 'em hell"! In contrast, according to Anderson, Clifford counsels the big corporations "not to attempt bitter-end resistance to Federal legislation or regulation that seems politically inevitable".
Nothing could have been more "politically inevitable" than the victory of Tom Dewey in 1948. All the experts predicted it, the Chicago Tribune even got out an early edition dated November 3, 1948 with a banner headline that Dewey had won! To Hairbreadth Harry Truman, Clark Clifford said, Don't give up the ship! To the big corporations he has said, Give up the ship. Maybe you won't have to walk the plank. The corporations have paid him fees and retainers at the reported rate of $500,000 per year, net. In 1962, in the steel-price crisis, when Jack Kennedy said businessmen were "sons of bitches", some businessmen got mad. The situation was tense. But Kennedy sent Clifford along with Arthur Goldberg (then Secretary of Labor) to talk to steel's top management. Clifford explained to them, quietly and unobtrusively, that they really are "sons of bitches" and the best way out was to go along with the President. They did. [H: Hummnnn--seems to be a ploy that always works with whomever may well have the power as you move along!]
Clifford's stance as an attorney representing big business vis a' vis the government is inevitably reminiscent of that of his fellow Schemer in Johnson's back parlor, Abe Fortas. Both of these Liberal lawyers have been richly paid by their conservative corporate clients for valorously counseling discreet surrender to ultimately omnipotent government! The analogy would be a criminal lawyer's telling a client, I can help you cop a guilty plea and get you off with a lighter sentence, and then his being flooded with gratitude, whether the client was actually guilty or not. A writer in The New York Times describes Fortas as "a shrewd, tough advocate with a philosophy reminiscent of Clarence Darrow's and clients reminiscent of Daddy Warbucks", and again speaks of the "the outstanding ability of Fortas, a top-notch Washington lawyer, to understand the problems of businessmen and plead their cause". The writer of the Times article, Fred P. Graham, evidently does not actually read Little Orphan Annie, for the Daddy Warbucks of that strip would never cringe like an Abe Fortas or Clark Clifford client. Graham recites an episode in which Fortas, early in 1967, called the chairman of Mobil Oil long distance in Hot Springs to tell him Johnson said the headlines coming out of the tycoonfest then going on at the Virginia spa were disturbing and they had better straighten up and fly right or the President would act. That meant specifically one Ralph Lazarus, of Federated Stores, who had been sounding off about government spending for Vietnam. Lazarus promptly issued an explanation, says Graham, adding: "Obviously, the President had chosen a man to pass the word who knew how to speak the businessman's language". And it is a fact that prior to going on the Supreme Court Abe Fortas had been counsel for Federated Stores.
manner would presumably be more elegant than Abe Fortas' (his estimated income was twice as great), but the message would be the same. Paralleling Graham's story about Fortas in one by Patrick Anderson, also in The New York Times Magazine, about Clifford. It seems that Clifford was representing International Telephone and American Broadcasting when they were contemplating a merger. He advised them against it. So they got another lawyer, and started to merge. Immediately the government started antitrust action. It cost them a lot more than even Clifford's fee would have been. But they could charge it up to education: When Clifford says mustn't touch, the Attorney General is ready to slap your wrist--hard-watch out! You see, what Fortas and Clifford have been selling Washington is protection.
It was largely during Eisenhower years that Clark Clifford got rich. Though he told David Lilienthal in 1951 that he as "uneasy about what will happen after Truman is out", the fact was, of course, that basic policies didn't change. The most basic policy of stronger government over the American people, weaker government in foreign affairs has not changed at least since the Teheran Conference of 1943. Nor did most of the middle-management level of the bureaucracy--division heads in the various Federal agencies--change. Clifford was steeped in the policies, and he knew his way around the bureaucracy like a highway patrol knows the freeways and cloverleafs. He really sold that protection. He worked up to four law partners each making a couple hundred thousand dollars a year, and they didn't even get their names on the door!
Still and all he was a Democrat, and it was under Democrat Presidents that he came on like Richelieu. The most astonishing thing is Clifford's stand-in with John F. Kennedy. For Clifford was Stuart Symington's campaign manager for the Democratic nomination at Los Angeles in 1960. Of course, Symington lost. Only less astonishing, for that matter, is Clifford's access to President Johnson, for Johnson had been a candidate in 1960 at Los Angeles, too, remember?
Clifford was Senator John F. Kennedy's personal lawyer before Los Angeles, and after Symington was out of the picture Clifford told Kennedy campaign secrets of 1948, for such use as they might be, in 1960. Kennedy hired Clifford to tell him what to do! Arthur Schlesinger tells how at the same briefing session early in the campaign where Clifford told Jack Kennedy how he put Truman back in the White House in 1948, Kennedy then said he had one other thing on his mind:
If I am elected, I don't want to wake up on the morning of November 9 and have to ask myself, "What in the world do I do now?" (A Thousand Days, p.101.)
Kennedy then and there offered Clifford the job of formulating the general approach and program of the Kennedy Administration. Quietly and unobtrusively, Clifford accepted. Kennedy defeated Nixon. Next day, Eisenhower suggested that the new victor name and emissary to maintain liaison with the expiring Republican Administration. Kennedy didn't think twice. He named Clifford.
Three years later, "Late on the afternoon of Wednesday, November 27," Rowland Evans and Robert Novak tell us, "Clifford was asked to the White House to see the new President". Clifford and Johnson talked into the night. "Clark", the President said, "you've become the transition expert". (Lyndon B. Johnson: The Exercise of Power, p. 346.) That was five days after Dallas. Sort of chilling when you think about it. And curious. Johnson and Clifford, though close once before, had not had dealings with each other for years. Yet perhaps it was natural enough. Johnson was a new President on the job. Clifford had seen them come and go--a "transition expert".
Clark Clifford was especially quiet and unobtrusive during the Kennedy years. The only position to which he was formally appointed was first as a member, then as chairman of the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, set up after the Bay of Pigs to do something about the CIA. Schlesinger says, "Kennedy moved quietly to cut the CIA budget in 1962 and again in 1963." Clifford, however, survived--a transition expert like Talleyrand.
The transition to Johnson was not safe until after the election of 1964, and Clifford may have been as important in that year as he was in 1948. His role in trying, along with Abe Fortas, to censor the Walter Jenkins case out of the press is well known. A more important contribution, not unrelated to obscuring the Jenkins case, went to what Evans and Novak call the "Anti-Campaign". They describe that campaign as "clandestine 'black propaganda' organized by a dozen brainy Washington-based Democrats, some in and some out of government". "Black propaganda" is a technical term in psychological warfare. What it means is lies. Naturally, this operation, as Evans and Novak tell us, was "conceived and watched over by Lyndon Johnson". Just as naturally, a gentleman like Clark Clifford would not take part in such degrading work. Evans and Novak list exactly twelve of Johnson's disciples who did this job, "security conscious and well-versed in the propaganda of politics". Most of them are not at all well known. Adam Yarmolinsky, yes. Daniel P. Moynihan, probably. Myer Feldman, maybe. Maybe one or two others. Tom Finney and John Sharon, no. They are two of Clark Clifford's law partners that don't get their name on the door! In this AC-DC (Anti-Campaign, District of Columbia) group, say Evans and Novak, "Feldman and Sharon were first among equals". The main purpose of the Anti-Campaign was to hit Goldwater below the belt. You have to admit they did the job. Dirty business. Count me out, said Clark Clifford. I'll send my partners.
The Anti-Campaign and the Pro-Campaign were, of course, related--two faces of the same coin. The Anti-Campaign said Goldwater was a megalomaniac who wanted to blow up the world with nuclear bombs, especially little girls picking daisies. The Pro-Campaign said Lyndon Johnson was pious, peace-loving and your best protection. This positive statesmanlike approach was one Clifford could deal with more directly. The week Walter Jenkins was exposed, Khruschev was ousted, the Chinese allegedly exploded an atomic bomb, and possibly the worst calamity of all, Harold Wilson came to power in England. "The State Department", according to Patrick Anderson, "urged that the President in no way try to make political capital out of the tense international situation". The New York Times Magazine, January 28, 1968, p. 75.)
"Clifford argued," continues Anderson, "that foreign policy was what the campaign against Goldwater was all about and that the President should project himself as a leader who was calm and confident amid the international turmoil--with the obvious implication that the 'trigger-happy' Goldwater would be less calm and confident".
"Foreign policy was what the campaign against Goldwater was all about," said Anderson. To be sure. Whatever Goldwater himself may have felt or thought, his enemies did not take seriously his "Conservatism". What they did take seriously was his "jingoism," as they might have called it, and the fact that he was a Brigadier General in the Air Force Reserve, a qualified jet pilot. He must have that kind of mentality. To a true "Liberal", a "man of good will", who aspires to see one world under Man, administered by peace-loving scientists and intellectuals (and a few lawyers), a Barry Goldwater type is THE ENEMY. He symbolizes the atomic bomb in possession of the American military. Lyndon Johnson has, since his election in 1964, done in Vietnam almost everything which he said during the campaign would be catastrophic if Goldwater did it. Yet he has never made a move toward any military use of nuclear weapons. Since nothing else we can do in Vietnam or Korea can jar even slightly the Sino-Soviet hold on the Eurasian Heartland, the Rusks, the Rostows, and the Cliffords can stick with Lyndon Johnson long enough for the Establishment to think carefully who his successor ought to be.
November 1968 is before us. What Clark Clifford's role will be remains to be seen. But in 1964, as in 1948, Clark Clifford was mainly for disarming the United States of its nuclear weapons.
* * *
I am running about as far behind as you people can get in your own daily lives so I ask for a bit of input.
I ask that the Hink Vissor material be put to disc and all of it run, along with the messages inserted to and from Ken Vardon of APFN.
Of all the ones I ask be helped as quickly as possible in financial stabilizing--among the first is PLEASE, Ken Vardon--and get him to network a major FAX SYSTEM.
WHILE RONN JACKSON IS IN NEVADA--PLEASE SET UP A MEETING WITH VARDON. THE TIME IS AT HAND TO INTEGRATE OTHER PLAYERS AND GIVE SOME OF OUR LOCAL EXHAUSTED PARTIES A BREAK. THIS IS NOT TO INFER THAT THE "OTHERS" HAVE NOT BEEN OVERLY BURDENED--IT IS JUST THAT WE MUST BEGIN TO ATTEND ONE ANOTHER IN ORDER TO NOT PHYSICALLY LOSE OUR TEAM.
The next is very important for several reasons, the first of which is that I am asked to comment--BECAUSE IT IS IN REGARDS TO ONE JAMES "BO" GRITZ. My comments are the same as always--the truth will "OUT"--eventually and always.
Is Bo put upon? Is truth on the part of the "Indians" or on the part of "Bo"? TRUTH is not on "the part" of any--TRUTH IS. The "intent" of our good Colonel is somewhat in question more and more and more as time passes and THAT is what is necessary to gaining truth--GET ALL THE INFORMATION YOU CAN GARNER--AND THEN (ONLY THEN) CAN YOU MAKE DISCERNMENTS OR ACTION JUDGMENTS. BEWARE, HOWEVER, OF ANYONE ADVOCATING SINGULARLY RACIST, RELIGIOUS OR MILITARY VIEWS--THOSE ACTS ARE NOT OF GOD OF HOLY LIGHTED CREATOR.
This does not mean that a man who takes up a weapon in protection is somehow lesser--it means that a weapon of violence MUST BE THE LAST ALTERNATIVE CONSIDERED FOR ACHIEVEMENT OF FREEDOM. IT MAY WELL NOT MEAN, HOWEVER, THAT WEAPONS MIGHT NOT BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN FREEDOM--THAT IS A BRIDGE NOT TO BE CROSSED BEFORE YOU EVEN FIND WHETHER OR NOT THERE IS A RIVER TO BE CROSSED NEEDING A BRIDGE. At best, violence of any kind is only a weapon of the moment--NEVER of lasting peace. Ponder it.
I will present a news item from a paper based in South Dakota and shared by Little Crow:
1994 Indian Country Today (received by FAX today 8/11/94)
NEZ PERCE FACE NEO-NAZI
Indian Country Today
KAMIAH, Idaho--Indians and non-Indians joined here last week-end to oppose plans of a neo-Nazi group to build a stronghold community in the middle of the NEZ PERCE Tribe's land holdings in north-central Idaho.
Last weekend's pow wow, entitled "A Gathering of Culture and Unity", was after James G. "Bo" Gritz announced development plans for 440 acres of mountain-top property near Kamiah. Mr. Gritz was a Populist Party presidential candidate in 1992 and briefly ran for vice president in 1988 with Populist presidential candidate David Duke, then Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan.
In Mr. Gritz' Center for Action newsletter, homes for sale in the "Almost Heaven" project have been promoted as a place where the White supremacists "will be sealed up against the dragon and the Wrath of God poured out against his enemies". The newsletter further described the development as a "Christian Covenant. ... self-sufficient township sanctuary" where Mr. Gritz and his supporters "will come in numbers selected together... prepared to fight for our families, homes, Constitution and Heavenly Banner".
Mr. Gritz, who reportedly served as a Green Beret in Vietnam, has created organizations that host seminar on special weapons training, led by former military and police firearms experts. His organization has adopted the euphemism "constitutionalists" and espouses racism against non-Whites--including Indians--anti-Semitism, and opposition to taxes and federal authority. Mr. Gritz has been quoted as being unconcerned about his NEZ PERCE neighbors, who he described as being "like buffalo--dormant and stupid".
Ironically, it is illegal taxation that allowed Mr. Gritz to move into the NEZ PERCE reservation.
Mary Tall Bull, a NEZ PERCE tribal member and organizer of the weekend anti-racism rally, said the NEZ PERCE land holdings are now a checkerboard with parcels bought up by non-Indians over the years when the original NEZ PERCE owners could not keep up with property taxes. She said that since it was all Indian land, those taxes shouldn't have been levied in the first place.
Mr. Gritz and the Center for Action are not listed in the Kamiah area telephone directory and he could not be reached for comment. Jerry Gillespie, a former state senator in Arizona and spokesman for the Center of Action office in Mesa, Ariz., was out of town and not available for comment late last week.
Jonathan Mozzochi, research director for the Portland-based Coalition for Human Dignity, said in a telephone interview from his Oregon office that Mr. Gritz' proposed stronghold has generated much interest among all kinds of racist, skinhead, neo-Nazi and White supremacist organizations. "There's a bunch of malicious stuff going on over there", he said, adding that it is probably the top hot spot for such activity in the Northwest.
While the Northwest--and Idaho in particular--has become a magnet for well-armed fascist racists, both Mr. Mozzochi and Ms. Tall Bull said there has also been an outpouring of opposition to the invasion by long-time residents of the area.
Ms. Tall Bull said last week she'd received calls from all over the region and that she expected a good turnout for solidarity against racism at the weekend rally, even though many young NEZ PERCE people are away on firefighting duty.
* * *
We thank Avis Little Eagle, Managing Editor, for this article. Phone: 605-341-0011, ext. 22. SUPPORT THESE PEOPLE FIGHTING FOR THEIR LIVES.
It reminds me of your tale about the fox and the rabbit. It was dinnertime and the fox saw this rabbit--all fat and happy. He decided to have that rabbit for dinner--literally. The chase ensued. The rabbit finally outran the fox and when asked about the chase, replied, "The fox may have been running for his dinner--I WAS RUNNING FOR MY LIFE"!
THERE IS AMPLE DOCUMENTED INFORMATION IN J. EDGAR HOOVER'S PRIVATE FILES (HELD BY RONN JACKSON) TO PULL DOWN THE NATION--AS REGARDS THE ABUSE TO THE AMERICAN NATIVES. ALONG WITH THIS THE RECORDS ARE CREEPING OUT FROM EVERYWHERE--AS YOU RECALL THE HOPI WRITINGS--LEGAL DOCUMENTS REGARDING THE CRIMINAL ACTIONS AGAINST THE NATIVES COME ALSO FROM "FAT LADY SINGING". THERE IS HOPE--BELOVED BROTHERS, AND WE SHALL OFFER THAT WHICH IS NEEDED TO UPSET A FEW "CARTS" VERY SOON NOW--AS THINGS UNFOLD IN PROPER SEQUENTIAL SECURITY AND PROTECTION. LITTLE CROW IS BURDENED AS THE BEARER THAT UNITY MIGHT BE ALIGNED AMONG THE NATIVE NATIONS. IT IS NOT A BLESSING OF KINGDOM--IT IS A BURDEN BEYOND COMPREHENSION--BUT HE WILL BE UP TO AND WORTHY OF THE TASK. IT WILL BE UP TO THE BROTHERS AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THEY SEIZE THE MOMENT AND SERVE IN UNITY OR FALL TO THE WAYSIDE UNDER THE HOOFBEAT OF THE APOCALYPSE RIDERS. GOD BLESS YOU.
Does Little Crow know this or am I just "whistling Dixie"? Oh indeed he knows--HE is responsible for the service of our little "Sister" here who trips over the keyboard with a big Indian foot to the rear when the complaints get heavy! You each have a purpose and a task--it is responsible as you see another struggle--no matter how slight--to give the support needed and with Little Crow and Dharma--it is in KNOWING!
Little Crow, 2/3/91: We are many, many people and yet we are one. What we do today with our thinking, what we do tomorrow with our thoughts, what we do with our actions and our interactions with people determines the course of the universe itself. You ARE NOT POWERLESS. You are not without power.
5/19/90: Power--empowerment is a buzzword now. A lot of people are using this idea of being empowered. You're gonna get empowered... You empower YOURSELF by opening your eyes every morning and closing them every night....
3/3/91: You are capable of doing something that's never been done before and that is to make the world, the universe, a better place than it's been. That isn't going against the laws of nature, that's saying you have the power within you. You don't have to be a goddess to have it, or a shaman to have it, or a holy man, or a holy woman, or a medicine man, or a medicine woman. You've got it right there, just as you sit. YOU'RE IT!
and on "Responsibility":
2/3/91: Within us lives what it is we seek. If it is peace and harmony and balance among yourselves, with yourself, then accept that it's there. Accept the possibility that it dwells within you, because there isn't anybody on earth who can give it to you. You have to take that responsibility for yourself.
FROM THE GATHERING, By Little Crow, One World Publishing, P.O. Box 9148, Fountain Valley, CA 92708.
* * *
Little Crow, to you, brother, for all my relations--in honor, Mitakuye Oyasin, Aho!
I bend in humble gratitude for the guidance of my "little one" through this time of incredible passage--that you saw and KNEW and supported the "backbone" while the burden was breaking the back as well as the heart. We shall stand in your need of strength that this mission may be finished in glory--without beginning and without ending. Within the wings of our Great Spirit Father shall we serve.
REC #1 HATONN
FRI., AUG. 12, 1994 9:10 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 361
FRI., AUG. 12, 1994
RIPPED SLINGS AND BROKEN ARROWS
Before we write this morning I need to take up a few topics of personal and individual interest. We are flooded with letters, suggestions, thank yous, and complaints. I find all of them welcomed by all of us here--especially myself because it indicates your interest, time taken to communicate and interest focus. Some will be interested in recipes and health, others in only naming names and thus and so. Don't stop--just allow us to present "our side" of this invisible coin which turns so rapidly here that there is no upside or downside--just a spinning wheel which goes faster and faster while offering no way off and certainly no breaks for any participants. While we might sleep, America, you are flowing down the tubes at an ever increasing rate.
Most suggestions state that there is not time to read everything we cram into the paper and since costs are a burden--"cut it down"! Surely you don't MEAN THAT. If YOU can't read it all--surely someone who can do something WILL. Next comes the badgering about getting enough help to carry MORE. However, we find that this suggestion usually comes from someone who reads a "friend's" copy of the paper: because of tight budgets. This is fine also, but remember something--this paper is supported by subscriptions which do not even cover postage--and the little companies who offer the Gaia products--AS LOANS UNTIL SUCH TIME AS FUNDING ARRIVES ON THE "WHITE HORSE" WITH THE PROVERBIAL KNIGHT IN SHINING ARMOR.
We get volunteers who offer constantly and sometimes it can be worked out to have assistance with the journals--however, that paper keeps everyone up day and night here the entire week JUST TO HAVE A PAPER and GET IT OUT. Many would "come" and help--but must take care of selves financially. I think you see the problem--there is not sufficient funding to allow this.
The next "solution" to the above is "take paid advertisements". NO! That is like taking PAC money or bribes. We will not be saddled with the further accusations that we cater to far-out anything to make ends meet. Does that mean that the paper will NEVER take PAID advertisements? NO--it means that while there is so much controversy about this paper and sources that we have no time to select and research. We offer a lot of suggestions and advertise for others and, always, for authors who share information--but you will note we do so FOR THEM in exchange for sharing and BECAUSE THEY ARE VALID AND ARE IN MOST INSTANCES, IN AS BAD A FINANCIAL SHAPE AS ARE WE AT CONTACT.
The amusing one is: "Well, you have power so why don't you see to the money"? I AM--it simply does not come floating out of the wild-blue-yonder like counterfeit Federal Reserve Notes. Many things are underway through the PROPER channels to offer help and goodly ways to manage it. Further, there are ones who will take the helm and continue to build and scatter information--BUT WE HAVE TO GET THEM INTO FREEDOM AND HAVE ABILITY TO FUNCTION IN THEIR BUSINESS CAPACITIES. SEVERAL TIMES LARGE SUMS OF FUNDING MONEY HAVE BEEN STARTED THROUGH THE SYSTEM--LEGALLY AND TOTALLY COVERED BY GOOD BUSINESS PRACTICES--ONLY TO HAVE THE FEDS (JUSTICE AND TREASURY) STOP AND LITERALLY TAKE THE FUNDS! IT IS NOT EASY TO CREATE THE MEANS WHEN MOST OF YOU ARE STILL TRYING TO PROVE US TO BE NEGATIVE ENERGY FORMS OF SOME KIND--AND FURTHER, THE ENEMY DOES NOT WANT YOU GOODLY PEOPLE TO HAVE ANYTHING!
So, just WHO am I? For the interim period of time in these writings--do what the Federal Court does--just consider me an enigma and a product of an old woman's insane mind. That is what is touted! That is fine. I am a journalist who researches pertinent subjects and founded a paper for producing that information--ENOUGH! WHY DO YOU BLOW YOUR CHANCES OF UNDERSTANDING BY ENTANGLING US WITH LITTLE GRAY ALIENS, SATANIC FORMS AND ROTTEN EGGS (OR GOOD EGGS)? STOP IT--YOU WILL FIND YOUR INFORMATION, GET YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND THEN YOU WILL FIX WHATEVER IS BROKEN OR LEAVE IT BROKEN. I have my mission--you have yours--and they merge, no more and no less, in the physical world of reconstruction. We'll get to the spiritual truths and it will be when you have proof scattered all over you and can more easily discern mysticism from mystery or religion from spiritual truth.
When you are hung up on 12-1/2 foot vapor forms as George Abbott (lawyer for our opposition) claimed over and over just yesterday--you are focused on the stupid and it will bury you in entropy of garbage while the world goes right on turning and leaves you in the stockade. I ask that Brent's contact by Mr. Abbott be placed in the paper, please. There is such incredible presentation to prove somehow that all things here are ONE. NO--there are no-things here which are one--NONE! Abbott wanted Brent (of CONTACT) to tell him who the members are of the Institute Board. Say what? Why in the world would Brent of CONTACT know anything about the workings of a corporation called The Phoenix Institute for Research & Education, Ltd. or anything else? He doesn't even know about the Corporate business of anything called CONTACT. Then there were threats of a personal nature from Mr. Abbott and shouts of "slander" and thus and so. When Brent said to hold as he wanted to get this "promise" on tape (Mr. Abbott said it was not "a threat", it was a "promise [of action] the man slammed down the phone.
Is THIS important to YOU? Yes, because this IS you! YOU are being denied justice, freedom and all manners of feeling secure in your being. And, furthermore, this is the insidious way in which the tentacles of the criminal politicians infiltrate even the youngest of upcoming lawyers so that there is NO JUSTICE--only manipulation of case rulings, games and injustice at every turn of every pathway within "the system".
I am sure that there will be elsewhere in this paper notice of Linda Thompson's experiences with arrest and guns and thus and so--and cancellation of her militia's armed march on Washington. Good, I do not fault any patriot--but armed rebellion is incredibly foolish in all respects and will only remove good leaders from your service.
You will HAVE TO FORM NEW FACILITIES AND GOVERNING SEATS, NEW COURTS WITH ELECTED JUDGES ACCORDING TO THE CONSTITUTION! There is nothing sacred except SATANIC CRIME in a place called Washington D.C. A NEW GOVERNMENT WAS ESTABLISHED (THE UNITED STATES FEDERAL CORPORATION) where once you held what you call central government. GO SET UP A GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE PEOPLE along with collateral courts and jurisdictions UNDER THE LAWS OF THE CONSTITUTION--ALL OVER YOUR NATION! "THEY" DID IT--WHY CANNOT YOU DO IT? OH--FORCE AND MONEY? WELL, THAT IS A PROBLEM, ISN'T IT? SO YOU NEED TO GET INFORMED SO THAT YOU CAN FIGURE A WAY TO COVER BOTH.
I DO NOT ADVOCATE OVERTHROW OF ANYTHING--IF THERE BE CRIMINALS AGAINST YOU AND YOUR CONSTITUTION--PROSECUTE THEM PROPERLY. IN-SURRECTION IS NOT NECESSARY--THEY ARE THE ILLEGAL BUNCH OF TREASONISTS HOLDING TO THE POWER BY FORCE--ONLY THE FORCE IS NOW EVER SO MUCH MORE TERRIBLE.
RUSSIAN EQUIPMENT (MILITARY)
We have a nice NEW report from yesterday from one who saw with the "Horse's mouth eyes" while flying over Mississippi..."MORE GATHERED RUSSIAN MILITARY EQUIPMENT THAN SEEN IN WORLD WAR II". They are all over your nation while you didn't notice and watched Biliary's escapades. By the way--how many of you realize that the suggestion about Biliary's lesbian tendencies was simply TO COVER HER RELATIONSHIPS WITH SUCH AS VINCE FOSTER?
VINCE FOSTER MURDER
Here is the latest "overlooked for public release", an interesting document and I will quote: "Most astoundingly the FBI found semen on Foster's shorts [H: At investigation of his murder and autopsy.] and multi-colored carpet fibers on his jacket, tie, shirt, shorts, pants, belt, socks and shoes. Blond human hairs were found on his t-shirt, pants, belt, socks and shoes.
"...The Fiske report does not indicate that any effort was made to determine the origin of the hair or fibers. [H: Now wouldn't O.J. Simpson enjoy such treatment?] The Fiske report simply ignores the evidence which does not take a rocket scientist to figure out the likely implications".
And just where did this come from? THE FBI! So what? Well, Mr. Fiske, remember, worked FOR the Clintons in one way or another all the way back to Arkansas and he ruled in his investigation of these crime possibilities: "Associated Press: Washington--Cleaning up two matters that have pained the White House, special prosecutor Robert Fiske announced Thursday that Vincent Foster's death was indeed a suicide and declared he would not bring criminal charges over White House contacts with Treasury officials who were over-seeing the Whitewater investigations".
It is interesting to note that wherein such information was priorly published in the New York Post--THAT PAPER HAS SUDDENLY "GONE SILENT" AND FISKE IS PROHIBITED FROM REVEALING THE CONTENTS OF HIS STUDY--OR THE FBI REPORT--TO THE PUBLIC.
Now, you readers who object to our variety of subject material--YOU TELL ME WHERE YOU ARE GOING TO GET THIS INFORMATION? IS IT IMPORTANT? YES INDEED!! "LAY OFF OUR PRESIDENT AND LET HIM TRY TO DO HIS JOB"! I am warned. Lay off? What do you mean--lay off? Are you of the public already gone mad?
FEMINIZING THE POPULATION
"So then, why are the people so mixed up and so many men are now gay and women are queer"? No, this is a real question I received just yesterday, I am not "making it up".
It has to do with many things but mostly as to changes in sexual orientation it has to do with the simple act of estrogenizing (female hormone) your population. Indeed any woman taking estrogen--should KNOW that there is "artificial" hormone (estrogen) perfected and presented in so many ways as to astound the observers. There is, in marijuana alone, enough Estrognic Chemical Properties as to boggle the mind and men, for instance, utilizing that substance will become feminine right down to breast enlargement and oozing from the nipples--as the body tries to lactate. This chemical is flooded upon the market and in the very air breathed in specified locations and in Gay Communities--it even is present now (because of catalytic converters in auto exhaust systems) in exhaust systems and is called THC (tetrahydrocannabinol, which is the active ingredient in marijuana). And it goes on and on and on. Where are you going to learn this, Public? Does it matter? Perhaps not to YOU but it surely does to those praying for regaining FREEDOM and CONSTITUTIONAL LAW!
This continues to be the biggest bug-a-boo complaint of all in that we continue to call a spade a spade and tell you about the Khazarian Zionists. Well, they ARE the anti-Christ and they are PROUD OF IT! They have sucked in every group within your systems of society--INCLUDING THE EVANGELICAL TEACHERS OF THE SO-CALLED "CHRISTIAN" COMMUNITY. Now that some of the evangelists themselves are seeing the light and speaking about it--the ADL B'nai B'rith are attacking like the Pit Bulls of Hell.
THE COURT SYSTEM
And the court system. Why do we keep badgering the court system? Is it to make you miserable and waste your time considering Ekkers and George Green? NO--it is the inclusive force behind all the evil EMPIRE. THROUGH THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IT IS INTENDED THAT THE CRIMINALS GET EVERY INCH OF YOUR LANDS AND EVERY LAST ITEM OF YOUR PROPERTY--LAWS AND RULES HAVE BECOME THEIR TOOLS--NOT YOUR PROTECTION.
Elsewhere you will find a prime example of the corruption of your very President and associates. FROM THE NETHERLANDS IS A COURT FILING AGAINST CLINTON, RENO, ET AL. FOR TREASON, BRIBING IN TREATIES, THEFT (DIRECT) OF MONEY THROUGH THE BANKING SYSTEM AND SO ON.
SUPPORT KEN VARDON & APFN
By the way--KEEP SUPPORTING KEN VARDON OF APFN-this is all being sent back and forth through him and this kind of communication is both expensive and deadly dangerous.
I ASK RIGHT NOW--THAT KEN AND RONN MAKE CONNECTIONS--IMMEDIATELY! WE ARE NOT GOING TO TOLERATE LITTLE PERSONAL PRATTLINGS ABOUT THIS OR THAT TAKE PLACE AS ONE INDIVIDUAL PITS OPINION AGAINST ANOTHER--YOU NEED IT ALL AND THEN, ONLY THEN, CAN YOU DISCERN AND JUDGE. CONTACT IS NOT SOME EXTRA-TERRESTRIAL RAGSHEET--IT WAS BIRTHED AND NURTURED TO BE THE VOICE FOR YOU-THE-PEOPLE AND A RESOURCE OF INFORMATION IN TRUTH!
HOT, LAST-MINUTE NEWS
As a good example of pressure and quantity of information, just now within the past 5 minutes information has come that in Sacramento, California there are, literally, military instructions going up all over the southern area of the city and working northward--on street signs, stop signs, etc. This would be in the general approximation of movement from McClellan military base. Remember the Crips and Bloods moving into Sacramento for training last week? It is all connected, readers. Further, Brent (who is simply going to have to pour more time into Journalism) is following up on information that goes "something" like this": "...the Generals in charge and Delta Force are meeting on August 20th... to take our nation back"! What does this mean? Who knows--so we have to find out and that takes hours of manpower and investigation. At this point we can't do it all so we have to work with what we have and then go international with publication. Can we do it? Perish the thought of FAILURE! It is not in the PLAN. Failure is something which is going to be experienced by GOD's ENEMIES--NOT GOD!
At this time we have work stacked up which needs airing, to the window level of every work-room. The CONTACT layout and editing people are up until the layout for press LEAVES in the morning of Tuesdays--without rest or sleep two nights before. Be patient with your urgings and especially your complaints--and most especially, personal inquiries. We love and attend each and every mailing and communication. Human endurance and time ability are overwhelming and that means patience is requested above and beyond all.
Man does not live by bread alone. Remember? That means, in our examples, that you cannot live simply by the notorious information or disinformation--but must also be brought into awareness of the small and mostly missed items. Let me example that statement please.
Gunther Russbacher is a precious friend to most of you--a deadly enemy to others. He is now free and about his business and service TO ME! He has an interesting background which I won't share again here--but remember that one notorious and notoriously hated-by-the-Jews person from Austria is Kurt Waldheim.
Well, readers, Kurt Waldheim is Gunther's "Godfather" and is in the process of working out some big intrigues WITH GUNTHER (which impact us magnificently) in the Philippines--among other things and places. The Khazarian "Jews" hate this man with a passion only saved for the Lighted God Himself! You must understand that accusations do not make truth.
So, what comes to my attention just now? The following:
DAILY NEWS, Saturday, Aug. 6, 1994. From The New York Times.
POPE DRAWS JEWISH IRE FOR KNIGHTING WALDHEIM
ROME--Pope John Paul II has drawn Jewish and Israeli outrage by conferring a papal knighthood on the former Austrian president, Kurt Waldheim, who has been accused by the U.S. Justice Department of serving with a German army unit that committed atrocities in the Balkans during World War II.
The bestowal of the Order of Pius IX in the Vatican's embassy in Vienna on July 6 seemed a remarkable contrast to efforts at reconciliation between the Vatican and Israel, which established diplomatic relations in June after centuries of animosity between Catholics and Jews. [H: Does this mean that the Catholics are NAZIS, as Waldheim was accused of being among the worst of the NAZIS!?]
The Vatican has given no formal explanation of the move, despite a protest on Thursday by Shmuel Hadas, Israel's ambassador to the Holy See, who expressed "concern and surprise" that the pope had conferred the order on Waldheim.
The Order of Pius IX is one of five orders that the pope may bestow. The Vatican embassy in Vienna said Waldheim received the knighthood in recognition of his efforts for peace during his tenure as U.N. secretary general from 1972 to 1980.
Many Jewish organizations, however, took issue with what seemed further evidence of an enduring and somewhat mysterious relationship between the pope and a man who stands accused in the United States and elsewhere [H: NO HE DOES NOT! ONLY YOUR MEDIA HAS PRESENTED SUCH LIES!!] of helping Nazi occupying forces in the Balkans.
[H: Does ANYONE OUT THERE remember World War II and what happened to Austria? It didn't matter whether or not you liked, loved or hated the Germans or the NAZIS. (But remember the NAME of the Jews: "AshkeNAZI" and "Sephardic"? It is important that YOU know the difference). When Germany took control and power over Austria--if you were involved or a male of proper age--YOU FOUGHT OR SERVED THE GERMANS. Whether or not, for instance, you like or dislike income taxes--you pay them--WHY? Because the ones in power HAVE THE BIG GUNS! If YOU don't stop moving with the garbage truck you can expect NOTHING, save garbage, in your future.]
Earlier this year, a report by the Justice Department said Waldheim had "occupied positions of increasing responsibility and sensitivity, for which he was decorated, in regions where notoriously brutal actions were undertaken by the Nazi forces in which he served." [H: Ah, we can have a Schindler's List fantasy--but no possibility of any shred of goodness by one Waldheim? I WARN YOU, READERS, THE LIE WILL DESTROY YOU! Remember, further, this "JUSTICE" department being touted--is the one of Butch Janet RENO who incinerates babies and children at places like WACO and Mothers and children--at Randy Weaver's. This is THE Justice Department who sent an American Citizen to his doom in Israel in misidentification--REMEMBER?]
The report accused the former Austrian leader of having served with units that massacred civilians, executed prisoners and identified Jews for deportation. Although Waldheim repeatedly has denied responsibility for war crimes, the Justice Department called his disavowals unconvincing.
Speaking on the pope's behalf when he bestowed the order July 6, Archbishop Donato Squicciarini, the Papal Nuncio--or ambassador--in Vienna spoke of Waldheim's period as U.N. secretary general and told him, "You have effectively contributed to the development of instruments for the promotion of peace and the avoidance of conflict as well as for an international policy of development and the protection of the environment".
* * *
Now let us look at what this says--REALLY. The "Jews" get everything--including tax exemption for RELIGION, etc. I believe the "pope" is of the Catholic "religion". What does a Jew have to say about what a Catholic bestows on the "religious" head of a "subject" or anybody else?? Do you think the hierarchy of the Jew religion gives a good bit of hog-swill or would allow a Catholic to interfere with Rabbinofying a Zionist or Jew? I guess NEXT will come the "Anti-Semitic" charge AGAIN against Waldheim? Well, good buddies--WALDHEIM IS A SHEMITE (SEMITE)--THESE FALSE JEWS ARE NOT! I doubt that even if Waldheim were a terrible man--he would be AGAINST HIMSELF! Be fair, readers, YOU just simply don't "know it all" yet--do you?
I want to change back to the subject of the Judicial kettle of rotten fish. To do so, I am going to use another accused ANTISEMITIC's material. Oh, indeed, "another" was a very proper use of language--I AM THE MOST ACCUSED ANTI-SEMITE ON THE UNIVERSAL STAGE. I, TOO, AM A SEMITE BY LINEAGE--BUT THAT SEEMS TO HAVE LITTLE TO DO WITH THE LIARS.
I am going to share a "presentation" by EUSTACE MULLINS. In it he refers to another author and gives great honor to the work presented. We will suggest that you get that work as well as that of Eustace. RAPE OF JUSTICE is surpassed ONLY by the other works of Mullins, in quality, historic review and research and TRUTH!
I don't see a date on this material and it is as timely NOW as at any time prior to now so we won't spend time at backtracking.
JUDGES OR CRIMINALS?
Although many patriots have been given short shrift in American courts, few of them realize just how many of the misfits on the federal bench are thieves, drunkards, or mentally ill. A carefully researched book by Joseph Goulden, The Bench-warmers, (Waybright and Talley, NYC, 1974) reveals some amazing inside stories on the ability of judges to warp and destroy American Christian civilization. For instance, we all know of the havoc created among the nation's criminal control systems by "bleeding heart" judges, who immediately turn rapists, killers and other thugs loose to prey upon the unarmed citizens, while handing out a thirty-five year sentence to Howard Hunt on the charge that he knew about a burglary in which nothing was stolen.
Amazingly enough, Goulden traces the creation of this Thug's Paradise in America to two judges on the District of Columbia Appeals Court in Washington. They are two Jews, Judge David Bazelon and Judge Charles Fahey. Like many Jews, Bazelon underwent extensive psychoanalysis, and he adopted this as the solution to all problems. Born in a Jewish ghetto in Chicago, he became a tax lawyer and contributed heavily to the Democratic Party. A close friend of Sen. Paul Douglas, he was appointed to the Appeals Court by Harry Truman, and American justice hasn't been the same since.
Bazelon soon revealed his belief that criminals should not be punished, but that they should be returned to society, where, with psychiatric "help" they would immediately become useful citizens. District attorneys found it almost impossible to get Judge Bazelon to send a robber, a rapist or a killer to jail. Judge Bazelon also dismissed many carefully prepared cases on the grounds that the criminals "rights" had in some technical manner been infringed upon.
Another Jew on the D.C. Appeals bench, Judge Charles Fahey, enthusiastically adopted Bazelon's theories about "mental health," and soon they were freeing dangerous criminals on the flimsiest technicalities. The result was that Washington became the most dangerous city in America to walk in after dark. As the years went by, and Bazelon continued his "mental health" campaign, Washington became almost as dangerous by day, as the criminals realized that with a patron saint of thugs like Bazelon, they did not have to commit their crimes under the cover of darkness. It was the Supreme Court which really turned Washington into a Black capital, with the infamous decree outlawing contracts with racial covenants. The result was that the Whites had to flee to the suburbs, as Jewish speculators blockbusted one area after another.
Goulden's book tells the story of how Abe Marovitz became a federal judge in Chicago. Colonel Jake Arvey, the Jewish political boss of Chicago, took Abe, who was then a sergeant, to the officers' club in Manila during World War II. The other officers promptly threw Abe out. After the war, Abe became the mouthpiece for the top hoods in the Chicago area, including triggermen of the Al Capone gang. Jake asked him how he could make it up to him for the unfortunate episode in Manila, and Abe answered: "Make me a Federal judge".
Marovitz tells the story on himself that when a routine investigation was made concerning his appointment, a chum called him up and said: "Judge, the Gees been around asking questions. I didn't tell them nuttin". Another Chicago judge, William Campbell, amassed a twenty-million dollar fortune in real estate while on the bench, although his only income was his judge's salary, beginning at $8,000 and rising to $22,500. Campbell became a federal judge as a result of his friendship with Bishop Shiel of Chicago, who was such a fanatical Zionist that most area Catholics called him "Rabbi" Shiel. He spent much of his time at Jewish functions, dedicating a new synagogue or raising money for the United Jewish Appeal. As a result, he became Col. Jake Arvey's right-hand man in political wheeling and dealing. Judge Campbell fitted into the picture, hence the twenty million dollars in real estate that he was allowed to amass.
Goulden has some interesting background on the "Hero of the Watergate Trials", the "firm, courageous" Judge Sirica. Goulden reveals that Sirica was a law school dropout who operated a newsstand for a year at 9th and D Streets in Washington. An article in the Washingtonian magazine called him unfit for the bench and cited "his careless legal errors, his short temper, his inattentiveness to court proceedings, his misguided view of the purpose of judicial power, his lack of compassion for his fellow human beings". These qualities came to the nation's attention during the Watergate Trials, in which Sirica apparently was used as a tool to prepare the way for Nelson Rockefeller's assumption of the Presidency, as it was impossible for Rockefeller to ever be elected, after he took the wife of an employee of the Rockefeller Foundation, had a child by her, and finally married her, the victim of his ruthless passions bearing the curious name of "Happy".
After reading Goulden's book one begins to understand why free born American citizens have to cringe and grovel before the Supermen on the bench, nearly all of whom have been personally approved for their offices by the Anti-Defamation League for their support of Zionism. A Christian approaches these wielders of power as a slave approaches King Herod, for the guarantees of the Constitution mean nothing to the arrogant "benchwarmers", many of whom, as Goulden tells us, are deranged alcoholics on the take. The corruption of the judiciary is not as widely known as the corruption of the executive and the legislative branches of government, but the sad fact is the delicate system of checks and balances set up by the Founding Fathers to avoid tyranny have been corrupted by the Jew.
* * *
As a reminder I would share ANOTHER document which is very, very similar to one recently shared along the same lines--PUT OUT BY A JEWISH OR "ISRAEL" "MINISTRY". You must understand that with all the MISunderstanding and false statements, contradictions and the Kol Nidre constantly in use--EVEN THE "JEW" DOESN'T KNOW WHO HE IS OR WHAT HE IS! THIS MEANS, READERS, THAT THE ONES OF LINEAGE FROM THE ORIGINAL TRIBES OF GOD--ARE BEING MADE THE FOOL EVERY DAY THAT PASSES AND THEIR VERY HERITAGE IS BEING STOLEN DELIBERATELY AWAY FROM THEM. THE HUMBLE-"JEW" WILL BE THE FIRST DESTROYED WHILE THE FALSE-"JEW" TAKES HIS VERY EXISTENCE WHILE BRINGING THE VERY BLIGHT OF HELL UPON THE EARTH AND ALL ITS PEOPLES! This has NOTHING to do with race, religion, creed or color--it is a political man-manufactured LIE to enslave the masses while usurping POWER OVER THE WORLD.
I will share a bit of this little pamphlet but not all of it because it will be repetitious and the point is made right up front.
COULD YOU BE AN ISRAELITE AND NOT KNOW IT?
"Here's a paradox, a paradox, a most ingenious paradox: an anthropological fact, many Christians may have much more Hebrew-Israelite blood in their veins than most of their Jewish neighbors." Alfred M. Lilienthal
Could there possibly be any truth to this? If so, it would mean that the majority of Christendom and the rest of society has misidentified the people most prominent in the Bible. If Israel has been misidentified there is no doubt that major errors in doctrinal interpretation and application of Biblical prophecy have been made!
There are a variety of stories regarding the Israelites and their modern-day identity. It is not the purpose of this tract to relate another of those stories. Instead, it will furnish you with the rest of the story, the true story regarding Israel's modern identity, the one found in the Scriptures and verified by archaeology and history--a story not usually told by most preachers.
....Nearly all of Christendom is being taught that today's "Jews" represent Israel. Yet, how many of those same people have ever been taught that the Bible warns us of Israelite impostors? That's right, non-Israelites who fallaciously claim to be Israelites:
"I know ... the blasphemy by those who say they are Jews [i.e., Judahites, thus Israelites] and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan". (Revelation 2:9)
[H: I think it interesting that these "Jews" of the ancient tribes utilize the Christian Bible to offer proof of that which we have been telling you--so that you Christians can begin to, for gosh sakes, open your eyes. I have a lot to share about this as it is unfolding and your own evangelists have been swamped by the trap--and are now being hit hard by the so-called Jews because they are seeing what has happened--to Christianity and this new "Israel" and new "Jew".]
Also, how many Christians have been told that there is actually a people who admit to being these impostors? For example, The 1980 Jewish Almanac's first chapter entitled "Identity Crisis", begins with the following admission:
"Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'."
This fact is confirmed by several other Jewish sources and individual Jews. (The Jewish Encyclopedia (1905); The Standard Jewish Encyclopedia (1966); Nathan M. Pollock, Professor of Medieval Jewish History of Tel Aviv; Bernard Lazare; Robert Quillan; Dr. Benjamin Freedman; Arthur Koestler; James Yaffe; Paul Meyer and many more). Dr. Oscar Levy. Oscar Dr. quote went so far as to declare:
"And are not they [today's Jews] the inventors of the Chosen People myth"? [H: INDEED!]
Why hasn't Christendom and the American public been told that over 90 percent of the people known as "Jews" are NOT descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob? History reveals they are actually descendants of the fierce TURKISH, MONGOLIAN KHAZAR TRIBES WHICH ROAMED THE STEPPES OF SOUTHERN RUSSIA AND WHO ADOPTED THE RELIGION OF JUDAISM BETWEEN THE 7TH AND 9TH CENTURIES. TODAY, THE KHAZARS ARE KNOWN AS “JEWS” NOT BECAUSE OF RACE, BUT BECAUSE OF RELIGION.
AS STATED, THE BIBLE DECLARES THAT THERE WOULD BE ISRAELITE IMPOSTORS; THESE IMPOSTERS HAVE INADVERTENTLY OR DELIBERATELY IDEN-TEFIED THEMSELVES BY THEIR OWN WRITINGS. THEREFORE, IF "THEY" ARE NOT TRUE ISRAEL, SOMEONE ELSE MUST BE!
* * *
As short as we are for space I think it is time, please, to at the least, rerun Nora's work on this subject [see page 154]. We will focus on the more recent uncoverings of this group of self-proclaimed and self-styled "Jews".
ARISTIDE--ISRAEL AND HAITI'S DRUG SECRET
We don't have further time in this writing to do more--but as a leaving thought: How many of you realize that you are about to go into WAR in Haiti over politics and yet--Aristide (Haiti's President) not only speaks fluent Hebrew but was trained for "Clinton's Haitian Holocaust" in Israel as a JEWISH PLOT TO CONTROL DRUG MONEY!? This whole Haiti "THING" is about control of the operation of the Caribbean cartel and drugs.
Note what one writer of high qualifications states: "They could use 'drugs' as an excuse to invade. But you'll notice that up to this point they have resisted the temptation, because they don't want to REVEAL to the public what the real problem with Haiti is. You've probably wondered why one-third of the presidential daily schedule is devoted to Haiti. The answer is: DRUG MONEY--for the operations of the Mossad and the CIA, the secret service of the WORLD ZIONIST GOVERNMENT."
Don't believe it? Fine! But the Zionist organizations and press certainly do--and write about it constantly. The Washington Jewish Weekly, a Jewish publication, repeatedly confirms Aristide's Mossad backing. Why do YOU find it so hard to believe? The establishment press and media are completely controlled, monitored AND OWNED BY THE ZIONISTS.
I would ask you "patriots" to again begin to pay a bit of attention to Patrick Buchanan who tries to get his truth heard every now and then. He made a most enlightened statement about Haiti: "God willing, the saving grace of America's ruthless and ruinous policy toward the tiny, destitute nation of Haiti will be that it tarnishes forever the reputations of those who pursued it. In better times we would have called this 'A CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY'."
Ah, but remember--Clinton "tried [marijuana] once--but didn't inhale"! Oh? He has all the characteristics of physical presentation of a heavy smoker of "pot". But then, we do KNOW that he is an addicted "snorter" of "coke". Don't you remember old "Bubba Snorty"? If not, go back to the Front Page story of CONTACT for July 12, 1994, Vol. 6, No. 3.
Do "I" really dislike Snorty? No--certainly not any more than I dislike a whole big bunch of bums on your place! Anyone of SATAN's angels are MY ENEMY! That is not a particularly good place to stand, my friends! May YOU not make such an error in discernment or judgment! Salu.
REC #1 HATONN
SAT., AUG. 13, 1994 9:58 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 362
SAT., AUG. 13, 1994
GOVERNMENT BY THE PEOPLE
Is it a lost dream? No! It is finally taking some kind of shape as to possibilities. Somewhere in this paper SHOULD be a bit of an article by Jackson and "members" of the "Committee" presenting a most novel idea and solution for the dilemma of your nation--the possibility of having a "collateral" government. Amazing!
There is a major consideration, however, and that is "HOW" do you do such a thing? Well, since the Committee has been either deliberate or neglectful of the one you had originally--I think they can think of a way to accomplish a RETURN to same--WITHIN THE CONSTITUTION YOU HAVE!
POWER TO ACCOMPLISH
The logical question would be: "They have power of commercial affairs and small-time hoodlum activities but do they have enough power to pull off a return to Government under your Constitution??" YES INDEED--JUST THINK ABOUT IT!
INSURRECTION AND SUBVERSION?
Good grief, NO! Must you always move to the violent possibilities? There is no need for such--all you have to do, friends, is get the leadership of the disabused Intelligence Services, here and around the globe, the military leaders who know it is return to Constitutional Law--or the game is about over and the people unified so they can have alternative opportunities for free elections--and you have it made. The Russians in your nation for the U.N. will assist you because nobody wants a DEAD nation. The adversary constitutes ONLY ABOUT 3 TO, AT MOST, 5 PERCENT (3-5%) OF YOUR POPULATION--LESS IN OTHER NATIONS! YOU HAVE BEEN "HOODWINKED" (a good old Freemasonic TERM) and the FEW have all but destroyed the MANY.
CLUES TO THIS TRUTH OF POWER CONTROL AS IS
You continue to have need of more and more, more and more "CLUES" before making up your minds about anything and especially that your own Government would want to destroy you, disarm you and robotize you. What does it take? You still seem to think they are openly arguing over ONE thing when actually there is, being slipped within other bills and "acts", that which is more meaningful than all the words of lecture I can conjure.
GUN CONTROL AND DISARMING YOU
Sounds good? Is it? "They" have now enlisted the GANGS to patrol and police and "go door-to-door and pick up all weapons". But, there is a problem and danger about this approach--so guess what: Written WITHIN the "health bill" is the following law proposal:
(f) EFFECTIVE DATE--The amendment made by this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 1995.
But on what? Read on:
PART 4--OTHER PROVISIONS
SEC. 7131. INCREASE IN TAX ON CERTAIN HOLLOW POINT AND LARGE CALIBER HANDGUN AMMUNITION.
Oh well, you might say, "That's OK because I only have an ittybitty magnum 0105". No, keep reading as they classify terminology to "any striking 'Shells and Cartridges". So what is the point? In a HEALTH BILL there is this proposal of TAXING striking Shells and Cartridges--10,000 percent (10,000%).
I don't want to do this article today so I will wait for the "full" bill, as stated, to arrive so we don't get accused of "out of context" offerings. You will note, when we get there--that this portion was INTRODUCED TO BE INTEGRATED WITHIN THE HEALTH BILL--ON AUGUST 3. 1994! SNEAKY? I WOULD SAY SO.
THINK THIS IS SOME "PATRIOT" GARBAGE?
NO, it isn't. This partial "bill" AND information came from U.S. Senator Richard H. Bryan, United States Senate. The message accompanying the FAX stated: "Following is a FAX Rec'd from Sen. Bryan's office--From Health Bill pages 1177-1180.
"Re: TAX at 10,000% on ammo. Kimberly Marr is requesting the entire bill.
"What does all this have to do with 'Health'?
"We apparently have the 2nd Amendment RIGHT TO BEAR UNLOADED ARMS"!
Sly little devils, aren't they?
Why don't you know more about other bills passed such as the Federal Reserve, the Bretton Woods Agreements and thus and so? Because they are passed in the middle of the night by three or four people and CALLED BY OTHER NAMES!
You can be guaranteed that no matter how this begins, by the time it is instituted--it will COVER every kind of ammunition right down to pellets for sling-shots.
What does this REALLY MEAN, however? Why would they push this through NOW? SO THAT YOU NICE PEOPLE GO OUT AND GET GUNS AND STOCKPILE AMMUNITION EV-ERYWHERE UNDER THE SUN--AND THEN WHAM, THEY WILL COME ARREST YOU, IMPRISON YOU AND CONFISCATE ALL THAT YOU HAVE STORED! THEY WON'T HAVE TO WAIT UNTIL JANUARY 1, 1996 FOR THAT TRICK--THEY CAN DO THAT ONE--TODAY! How many people do you know who will wait for a bullet with a tax of a $100 for ONE? Nope, "they" will set you up and pluck you down! They WANT you to start now while the nerves are on end to stockpile that which you can get and go underground into the bullet-making business so they can REALLY GETCHA!
Do you further understand the "burying" part of this little maneuver? Page 1177-1180? This means that in the "bill" itself, you have to read 1176 pages before even FINDING THE PART DISCUSSED HERE! How many do you think will take notice--especially introducing it at "closing" time? Congress is trying to GET OUT [on recess].
I suppose "they" are getting ready for Linda Thompson's assault on Washington--with no ammo in her guns. I wouldn't place any bets WITH Linda Thompson either, friends--things just don't look good for her patriotic intentions. I am asking that Ronn Jackson reconsider his stance with support for her as some leadership "general" or whatever. Can't you ones STOP this GROUPIE bit and SAVE YOUR NATION--PROPERLY?
The POWER BROKERS are beginning to see who the enemy IS--and they will assist you IF you play your game carefully and in intent of Constitutional recouping--and not just some children's games of either cops and robbers--OR, getcha with the 'big guns'! YOUR ENEMIES HAVE BEEN ISOLATED FOR YOU--YOU WILL BE ABLE TO TELL A KHAZARIAN ADVERSARY FROM THE GOODLY PERSONS WHO ARE HUMAN IN THE STAND FOR HUMANITY. THESE ARE THE MOST BRILLIANT MINDS OF YOUR SPECIES--THESE WHO HAVE GAINED SUCH POWER PLACES. THEY WILL KNOW HOW TO REVERSE THIS THING--AND, THEY WILL FIGURE OUT THE VALUE TO SELVES OF DOING SO!
I am actually asked, "What do you think about Woodstock"? Well, I think you should have a stock "pile" of wood for a cold day when there is no gas in the lines. Otherwise, if you refer to that incredible blast on humanity called a gathering for unruly sex orgies--I think you know my thoughts and SHOULD KNOW YOUR OWN.
"Woodstock" in the 60s was the beginning of the end for your civilization--the "sex-revolution" which moved you, possibly forever, away from decency and right into death by disease and soul degeneration through moral misuse of all things wondrous and beautiful. YOU JUDGE! You honor this group of evil producers far more than would be a gathering set for the so-called "rapture". When you have arrived, as a civilization, to a point of HONORING evil above all else--you are LOST!
I hear you uneducated duckies saying, "Oh, good grief (or far more vulgarly put), he is off onto Jews and anti-Semitic crap"! OK, readers--you, again, HAD BETTER GET INFORMED--THE JEWISH COMMUNITY IS PUSHING AS HARD AS THEY CAN AGAINST THESE ALIEN "JEWS" WHO ARE NOT!
I would share an ADVERTISEMENT paid for by dozens and dozens of "Jews" in The New York Times Tuesday, August 2, 1994:
SHOULD JEWS FEAR THE "CHRISTIAN RIGHT"?
On June 9, 1994, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) [H: Remember the ADL is an organization of British Intelligence out of Tavistock Institute, London, England.] issued a report entitled The Religious Right: The Assault on Tolerance & Pluralism in America. We are a group of Jews who wish to make it known that we reject the implications of this report and deplore its publication.
We do not question that it is the proper role of the Anti-Defamation League to identify the enemies of the Jewish community. Jewish tradition, and indeed Jewish law, demand that the first concern of our communal organizations be the protection and survival of the community.
But the so-called "evidence" of a conservative Christian threat to Jewish security is derived from such discreditable techniques as insinuation and guilt by association. Thus the report uses the words and actions of a few marginal extremists to impeach individuals and groups whose only crime seems to be the seriousness with which they act on their Christian convictions.
It ill behooves an organization dedicated to fighting against defamation to engage in defamation of its own.
Insofar as the objections to the religious Right are honestly presented in the ADL report, they are mainly political ones: Christian conservatives advocate positions that run counter to many people's beliefs about such issues as abortion, school prayer, homosexual rights, and the meaning of the First Amendment.
And not only do Christian conservatives advocate these positions, but in recent years they have begun to organize, publicize, and attempt to elect candidates sympathetic to their views. This is no different from what many other groups including Christian liberals, have always done. By what proper definition of the term, then, does the political activity of Christian conservatives constitute an assault on pluralism?
The separation of church and state is not the same thing as the elimination of religious values and concepts from political discourse.
Moreover, Judaism is not, as the ADL seems to suggest, coextensive with liberalism. Nor, we wish to emphasize, does the Jewish community speak with one voice on the religious and moral--and political--issues of our time.
Above all, on the issue with which this community does speak in one voice, namely, the survival of Israel, the Jews have no more stalwart friends than evangelical Christians. [H: They have that right! Unfortunately!!] Judaism teaches the principle of Hakarat Hatov, that we have the duty to acknowledge the good done to us. In issuing The Religious Right the ADL has among other things seriously violated that principle.
For all these reasons, we call on our fellow Jews to reject this study. As a people whose history so vividly illustrates the bitter results of bigotry, we have a special obligation to guard against it, and all the more so when, as in the case of the ADL attack on our Christian fellow citizens, it emanates from within our own community.
For more information please contact: Toward Tradition, P.O. Box 58, Mercer Island, Washington 98040
* * *
Why do you continue to expect the "Jews" who don't even realize the term "Jew" is not applicable to them, to know that they are first in line for being had? YOU don't seem to realize that most of the "Christian" stuff fed you is pure unadulterated GARBAGE--brought forth right out of the ADL and TALMUD--under the guise of telling you it is out of the HOLY BIBLE and/or other RELIGIOUS "DOCTRINES".
You will come to know that "Jew" is not and was NEVER a term applied to the "Hebrew" or Judean races or even culture. It was conjured by MAN, called "JEWS"--ZIONISTS. THE RELIGION IS BASED ON A MAN-WRITTEN SET OF PROTOCOLS AND INSTRUCTIONS CALLED THE TALMUD--NOT THE BOOKS OF ANY RECOGNIZED TEACHER OR PROPHET.
"Ah," but you might say, "nobody told us so how could we know all this--or even the so-called 'Jews'"? How indeed? Well, Martin Luther told you and he lived between 1483-1546. George Washington told you! Thomas Jefferson, author of the Declaration of Independence, told you. Benjamin Franklin told you; Peter Stuyvesant, Dutch Governor of colonial New York (1592-1672) and even good old "Shakespeare" Bacon (Francis) told you and that was a long way back in his time (1561-1626). Since the Khazars adopted the label of "JEW" IN ABOUT THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY--WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE TO USE AS TERMINOLOGY FOR THE PROPER IDENTIFICATION OF THESE "BADLY ORIENTED" HOODLUMS OF SATANIC STRUCTURE? THE POINT IS TO CONFUSE--REMEMBER? Even Mohammed, in the Koran, spoke of these thieves of Judean heritage. Remember the Pharisees?? Good grief, readers, if you don't know anything--how can you possibly hope for betterment or salvation from your plight?
As the ones mentioned above spoke of these "people" there was no way to refer to them other than as "Jews" for there was no other term--and it was PROPERLY USED--TO FIT THE ONES WHO BEGAN TO AND DID "CALL" THEMSELVES "JEWS" AND "ZIONISTS". Remember the "Elders of Zion"? and the PROTOCOLS? No one was trouncing on the neighbor who happened to be from the Middle East somewhere in the so-called Holy Lands! However, it is these precious beings who are the most disrespected and trodden down by the Elite Zionists--those nice people THINKING themselves to be "Jews" but ARE NOT.
Do I agree with these speakers in point here? Yes and NO! But I do present what is here written--from researched source--not as my own commentary. I simply tell you that the Zionist Khazarian "Jews"--who deny CHRISTED virtue or being in purpose and intent--ARE MY ENEMY IN OPPOSITION OF GOD. DOES THIS MEAN I "DECLARE WAR" ON THEM? GOODNESS NO--I DON'T NEED TO DO SUCH A STUPID THING--THEY WILL ULTIMATELY DECLARE WAR ON THEMSELVES!
Then how do you function? Simple! Everything THEY do is in direct opposition in intent, instructions and action to the Truth of God. They have turned the laws and instructions of God in total opposite of presentation for rules and Laws of living human. When you stand against them--you must turn again in opposition of actions and intent of that which THEY project--while using the stupid laws they write to give loop-holes for themselves (i.e., you fight enforced ignorance with KNOWLEDGE, etc.). THEY CANNOT LIVE AND FUNCTION IN THE LIGHT OF TRUTH! THEY ARE OF THE DARKNESS--WITHOUT GOD. THEY WORSHIP THE LUCIFER OF THE FALLEN TRIBES.
I won't even try to present all the documentation given but will take a few pages from this encyclopedia as presented BY ONES THINKING THEMSELVES TO BE "JEWS"--BUT ARE NOT! I give honor to them who SEE.
(The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia states that "The Talmud" is the real "bible" of the Jews and that it supersedes the Old Testament. This volume has been condemned down through the ages for preaching hatred for Christ and all Christians. Read "The Talmud Unmasked" for the full shocking details.)
DENIS DIDEROT 18th Century French scholar. His famous Encyclopedie, the bible of the pre-revolutionary French 'enlightenment', has often been complained of by Jewish writers as 'anti-Semitic'. Some of Diderot's other writings are likewise unfriendly:
"And you, angry and brutish people, vile and vulgar men, slaves worthy of the yoke [Talmudism] which you bear. Go, take back your books and remove yourselves from me (La Moisade)".
"The Talmud taught the Jews to steal the goods of Christians, to regard them as savage beasts, to push them over a precipice... to kill them with impunity and to utter every morning the most horrible imprecations against them (Juifs)".
NESTA WEBSTER, In Secret Societies And Subversive Movements, Page 370:
"The Jewish conception of the Jews as the Chosen People who must eventually rule the world forms indeed the basis of Rabbinical Judaism. The Jewish religion now takes its stand on the Talmud RATHER THAN ON THE Bible".
F. TROCASE, In Jewish Austria:
"No obstacle discourages them; they persevere throughout the world, throughout the centuries, the unity of their race. The Talmud has given them a powerful organization which modern progress has been unable to change. Deep, ineradicable hatred of everything that is not Jewish stimulates them in war which they wage against Christian Society, which is too divided to be able to fight with the necessary energy".
COUNT HELMUTH VON MOLTKE, Prussian General:
"The Jews form a state and, obeying their own laws, they evade those of their host country.
"The Jews always consider an OATH regarding a Christian NOT BINDING [Kol Nidre "Vow of All Vows"]. During the Campaign of 1812 the Jews were spies; they were paid by BOTH SIDES; they BETRAYED BOTH SIDES".
MOHAMMED, in the Koran:
"Whoever is a friend of a Jew, belongs to them, becomes one of them. God cannot tolerate this mean people. The Jews have wandered away from divine religion. They are USURPERS. You must not relent in your work which must show up Jewish deceit".
* * *
I am going to stop right here and offer you some writings out of AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL.
COMING OF MOHAMMED PROPHESIED
Jmmanuel [H: Proper spelling for Immanuel/Emmanuel] was silent. And they hit him again on the head and he moaned in pain and started to speak, "Verily I say to you, as you beat and mock me, you, too, shall be beaten and mocked. The time will come in five times one hundred years when you shall have to atone for this day. A new man will rise up in this land and whip and persecute you, and you shall have to pay with your blood.
"He will create a new cult and have people call him a prophet, and he shall persecute your throughout all times. Even though he will be a false prophet and bring you a new false doctrine, he has great power and will have your race persecuted throughout all time to come.
"His name will be MOHAMMED, and his name will be, for your kind, horror, misery and death, which will be of your deserving. Verily, verily I say to you, his name will be written with blood and his hatred against your kind will be endless. But since he will be a false prophet and bring you a false doctrine, so will his cult eventually be finished, when your kind and his kind will put down the foundation for a bloody ending for this world." [H: Everybody with me so far? "...when your kind and his kind WILL PUT DOWN THE FOUNDATION FOR A BLOODY ENDING FOR THIS WORLD". That does NOT say "GOD" will put down, so why do YOU believe it will be of God, this Armageddon?]
These words caused such fury that they got extremely excited and beat him so brutally that Jmmanuel collapsed. When he had aroused somewhat, they pulled the purple coat from him and put his own garments back on his body and led him away to crucify him.
* * *
I also wish to offer from the same source (Jmmanuel, or if you prefer "Jesus" or "The Christos") on "oaths of no substance" (Kol Nidre).
AN OATH IS OF NO SUBSTANCE
"Woe unto you, you blind leaders of false teachings who say, 'If a person swears by the temple, that does not count, but if a person swears by the gold on the temple, that binds him'. You fools and blinded ones, you are the offspring of evil; why do you let people swear knowing that an oath is not binding and is a worthless act? How can you say that if a person swears by the altar, that does not count; but if a person swears through sacrifice, that is binding?
"You blind and false teachers, who gave you the right to demand an oath or to swear, since the Laws of The Creation state that oaths should not be given? Your speech should always be yes, or, no.
"Therefore, he who swears by anything on Earth or the universe, swears by something fleeting, which is without any substance. And therefore, an oath is of no substance either. Therefore, he who swears by anything commits a crime with respect to the truth of his word and makes it doubtful.
"Woe unto you, you blind leaders of a horde of blind who say: 'This should be done and that should not be left undone', since you represent a false teaching. Woe unto you who increase tenfold mint, meramie, dill and caraway seed, and consider least important the most important in the Law, namely the right to freedom and knowledge and the truth of The Creation." [H: I think you get the point! I will however now offer the actual Kol Nidre for your refreshment!]
In Volume VIII of the Jewish Encyclopedia on page 539 found in the Library of Congress, the New York Public Library and libraries of all leading cities, will be found the official translation into English of the prayer known as the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer. It is the PROLOGUE of the Day of Atonement services in the synagogues. It is recited three times by the standing congregation in concert with chanting rabbis at the altar. After the recital of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer, the Day of Atonement religious ceremonies follow immediately. The Day of Atonement religious observances are the highest holy days of so-called or self-styled "Jews" and are celebrated as such throughout the world. The official translation in English of the "Kol Nidre" (All Vows) prayer follows:
"ALL VOWS, OBLIGATIONS, OATHS. ANATHEMAS, whether called 'konam', 'konas', or by any other name, WHICH WE MAY VOW, OR SWEAR, OR PLEDGE. OR WHEREBY WE MAY BE BOUND, FROM THIS DAY OF ATONEMENT UNTO THE NEXT (whose happy coming we await), we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled, and void and made of no effect: THEY SHALL NOT BIND US NOR HAVE POWER OVER US. THE VOWS SHALL NOT BE RECKONED VOWS; THE OBLIGATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBLIGATORY; NOR THE OATHS BE OATHS." (emphasis supplied)
So where do you get the ongoing absolution of all lawyers and judges for telling lies and placing false control over the judicial system and the courts? Well, for one thing--the lawyers and judges who KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS AND PRACTICE THE 'ALL VOWS'--ARE OBLIGED TO LIE--NOT TELL TRUTH. Ones who don't know—just follow the rule of the "gold". And how did it come to be that the MOST percentage of lawyers, attorneys (there IS a difference) and now, medical doctors are "JEWS"? Ah yes indeed--the old PROTOCOLS which INSTRUCT THE ZION-IST JEWS TO: "5. As for the many other vexations you complain of: arrange that your sons become advocates and lawyers, and see that they always mix themselves up with the affairs of State, in order that by putting Christians under your yoke you may dominate the world and be avenged on them".
And just WHO are these "Christians"? ANY ONE WHO IS NOT A KHAZARIAN, TALMUDIC "JEW". IT GOES BEYOND THE TERM "GOYIM"--AND INCLUDES ALL WHO ARE NOT SPECIFICALLY AS DESCRIBED!
* * *
We need to take a break here in this writing. However I would like the staff to please insert information about obtaining journals, i.e., AND THEY CALLED HIS NAME IMMANUEL and those wherein we offered FACTS ARE FACTS FROM A LETTER TO: DR. DAVID GOLDSTEIN, LL.D. FROM: BENJAMIN H. FREEDMAN. [Journal #25 & #78, see book ordering info at end of this journal.]
When we return we will offer Francis Bacon's observation and move on to Martin Luther. Thank you.
REC #2 HATONN
SAT., AUG. 13, 1994 12:33 P.M. YEAR 7, DAY 362
SAT., AUG. 13, 1994
Continuation of comments:
FRANCIS BACON. 16th Century British writer, politician. In his The New Atlantis, he remarked that Jews: "hate the name of Christ and have a secret and innate rancor against the peoples among whom they live". He also disapproved of NON-Jewish USURERS as "Judaizers" who should wear "tawny bonnets" like Jews. [H: For emphasis as to what he may have meant, insert the picture near here of your goodly President Clinton with his little round bonnet! This is an insult to all nations and all religions--for it presents both a farce to those who honor the headcovering and all those who do not.]
MARTIN LUTHER 16TH Century German religious reformer, founder of the Protestant Church (1483-1546):
They are the real liars and bloodhounds, who have not only perverted and falsified the entire Scriptures from the beginning to end and without ceasing with their interpretations. And all of the anxious sighing, longing and hoping of their hearts is directed to the time when some day they would like to deal with us heathen as they dealt with the heathen in Persia at the time of Esther... Oh how they love that book Esther, which so nicely agrees with their blood-thirsty, revengeful and murderous desire and hope!
The sun never did shine on a more bloodthirsty and revengeful people as they, who imagine to be the people of God, and who desire to and think they must murder and crush the heathen. And the foremost undertaking which they expect of their Messiah is that he should slay and murder the whole world with the sword. As they at first demonstrated against us Christians and would like to do now, if they only could; have also tried it often and have been repeatedly struck on their snouts.
Their breath stinks for the gold and silver of the heathen; since no people under the sun always have been, still are, and always will remain more avaricious than they, as can be noticed in their cursed usury. They also find comfort with this: 'When Messiah comes, He shall take all the gold and silver in the world and distribute it among the Jews'. Thus, whenever they can direct Scripture to their insatiable avarice, they wickedly do so.
Therefore know, my dear Christians, that next to the Devil, you have no more bitter, more poisonous, more vehement an enemy than a real Jew who earnestly desires to be a Jew. There may be some among them who believe that the cow or the goose believes but all of them are surrounded with their blood and circumcision. In history, therefore, they are often accused of poisoning wells, stealing children and mutilating them; as in Trent, Weiszensee and the like. Of course they deny this. Be it so or not, however, I know full well that the ready will is not lacking with them if they could only transfer it into deeds, in secret or openly.
A person who does not know the Devil, might wonder why they are so at enmity with the Christians above all others; for which they have no reason, since we only do good to them. They live among us in our homes, under our protection, use land and highways, market and streets. Princes and government sit by, snore and have their maws open, let the Jews take from their purse and chest, steal and rob whatever they will. That is, they permit themselves and their subjects to be abused and sucked dry and reduced to beggars with their own money, through the usury of the Jews. For the Jews, as foreigners, certainly should have nothing from us, and what they have certainly must be ours. They do not work; do not earn anything from us, neither do we donate or give it to them. Yet they have our money and goods and are lords in our land where they are supposed to be in exile!
If a thief steals ten gulden he must hang; if he robs people on the highway, his head is gone. But a Jew, when he steals ten tons of gold through his usury is dearer than God himself!
Do not their Talmud and rabbis write that it is no sin to kill if a Jew kills a heathen, but it is a sin if he kills a brother in Israel? It is no sin if he does not keep his oath to a heathen. Therefore, to steal and rob (as they do with their moneylending) from a heathen, is a divine service. And they are the masters of the world and we are their servants--yea, their cattle!
I maintain that in three fables of AEsop there is more wisdom to be found than in all the books of the Talmudists and rabbis and more than ever could come into the hearts of the Jews.
Should someone think I am saying too much--I am saying much too little! For I see in writings how they curse us Goyim and wish us all evil in their schools and prayers. They rob us of our money through usury, and wherever they are able, they play us all manner of mean tricks. No heathen has done such things and none would do so except the Devil himself and those whom he possesses--AS HE POSSESSES THESE JEWS.
Burgensis, who was a very learned rabbi among them and by the grace of God became a Christian (which seldom occurs), is much moved that in their schools they so horribly curse us Christians (as Lyra also writes) and from that draws the conclusion that they must not be the people of God.
Now behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when they complain about being captives among us! Jerusalem was destroyed more than 1400 years ago and during that time we Christians have been tortured and persecuted by the Jews in all the world. On top of that, we do not know to this day what Devil brought them into our country. We did not fetch them from Jerusalem! Yes, we have and hold them captive, as I would like to keep my rheumatism, and all other diseases and misfortunes, who must wait as a poor servant, with money and property and everything I have! I wish they were in Jerusalem with the other Jews and whomsoever they would like to have with them.
How much more unbearable it is that we should permit the entire Christendom and all of us to be bought with our own money, be slandered and cursed by the Jews, who on top of all that be made rich and our lords, who laugh us to scorn and are tickled by their audacity!
What a joyful affair that would be for the Devil and his angels, and cause them to laugh through their snouts like a sow grinning at her little pigs, but deserving real wrath before God. (Von die Juden and ibren Lugen)
Maybe mild-hearted and gentle Christians will believe that I am too rigorous and drastic against the poor, afflicted Jews, believing that I ridicule them and treat them with much sarcasm. By my word, I am far too weak to be able to ridicule such a satanic brood. I would fain do so, but they are far greater adepts at mockery than I and possess a god who is master in this art. It is the Evil One himself.
Even with no further evidence than the OLD TESTAMENT, I would maintain, and no person on Earth could alter my opinion, that the Jews as they are today are veritably a mixture of all the depraved and malevolent knaves of the whole world over, who have then been dispersed in all countries, similarly to the Tartars, Gypsies and such folk". [H: EXACTLY AS THE TALMUD AND THE PROTOCOLS OF ZION INSTRUCT! YOU WHO THINK YOURSELVES TO BE JEWS--BEWARE, LEST YOU BECOME ONE OF THIS DECEITFUL GROUP OF LIARS AND FALSE HUMANS. Yes indeed--I DID SAY: "FALSE HUMANS". ARE ANY OF YOU BEGINNING TO SEE "THE LIGHT"???]
GEORGE WASHINGTON, in Maxims of George Washington by A.A. Appleton & Co.:
They (the Jews) work more effectively against us than the enemy's armies. They are a hundred times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in. It is much to be lamented that each state, long ago, has not hunted them down as pests to society and the greatest enemies we have to the happiness of America."
This prophecy, by Benjamin Franklin, was made in a "Chit Chat Around the Table During Intermissions", at the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention of 1787. This statement was recorded in the diary of Charles Cotesworth Penckney, a delegate from South Carolina.
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN (leading Founding Father, famous inventor, (1706-1790) stated:
I fully agree with General Washington, that we must protect this young nation from an insidious influence and impenetration. That menace, gentlemen, is the Jews.
In whatever country Jews have settled in any great number, they have lowered its moral tone; depreciated its commercial integrity; have segregated themselves and have not been assimilated; have sneered at and tried to undermine the Christian religion upon which that nation is founded, by objecting to its restrictions; have built up a state within the state; and when opposed have tried to strangle that country to death financially, as in the case of Spain and Portugal. [H: Note the term "Christian" NOT "Jesus Christian"--this is important. "Christ" is a "state-of-being", a state of Grace or "goodness, fairness, JUSTNESS". "Jesus" may well have been a "Christed" being--but "Jesus" is a NAME OF A MAN.]
For over 1,700 years, the Jews have been bewailing their sad fate in that they have been exiled from their homeland, as they call Palestine. But, gentlemen, did the world give it to them in fee simple, they would at once find some reason for not returning. Why? Because they are vampires, and vampires do not live on vampires. They cannot live only among themselves. They must subsist on Christians and other peoples not of their race.
If you do not exclude them from these United States, in this Constitution, in less than 200 years they will have swarmed here in such great numbers that they will dominate and devour the land and change our form of government, for which we Americans have shed our blood, given our lives, our substance and jeopardized our liberty. [H: Anyone care to argue the status of your nation?]
If you do not exclude them, in less than 200 years our descendants will be working in the fields to furnish them substance, while they will be in the counting houses rubbing their hands. I warn you, gentlemen, if you do not exclude Jews for all time, your children will curse you in your graves.
Jews [H: Remember "Jew" is the term taken for SELVES of this Asiatic Khazarian race of thugs, usurers and criminal Satanic people (not "human"). He who denies and is without God--is soul-less! HU-man is SOUL!], gentlemen, are Asiatics; let them be born where they will or how many generations they are away from Asia, they will never be otherwise. Their ideas do not conform to an American's, and will not even though they live among us ten generations. A leopard cannot change its spots. Jews are Asiatics, are a menace to this country if permitted entrance, and should be excluded by this Constitutional Convention."
[H: What YOU must come to KNOW is that "Jew" or "Zionist Jew", or "Zionist" can be of ANY RACE, CREED OR COLOR--IT IS A LABEL FOR A RACE OF PHYSICALLY-ORIENTED POWER-SEEKERS OF SATANIC ORIGIN. HE WHO WISHES TO JOIN THAT "GROUP" MAY CERTAINLY DO SO--BUT IN SO-DOING YOU CATEGORIZE SELVES WITHIN THE RANKS OF GOD'S ENEMY. IGNORANCE IS ACCEPTABLE UNTIL TRUTH IS KNOWN. TRUTH IS BEING PRESENTED--WHAT WILL YOU DO ABOUT IT? A WHOLE BIG BUNCH OF ONES THINKING THEMSELVES TO BE "JEWS" ARE HOPPING RIGHT OUT OF OLD SATAN'S BANDWAGON! THE POINT IS, PERHAPS, TO "KNOW THYSELF"--THAT YOU NOT PERISH IN THE BATTLE WHILE NOT EVEN SEEING THE WAR!
I believe the "Committee" will know what to do and HOW to do it--let us not continue to play games one with another as if we don't know who is who and what is what! You allowed this to happen to this wondrous nation--so let's just get about cleaning house of the corruption, crime and disease come upon you. The beasts of Satan will continue to destroy themselves--don't worry about it. They do in their own as quickly as their enemy in God when the rules are changed and fitted to the cause by "man"--who always reaches beyond even the King of Darkness!]
* * *
I just want you "discerning-inquiring" readers to realize that your own President and Vice President, Clinton and Gore, ATTENDED A WORLD JEWISH CONGRESS IN THEIR SILLY LITTLE HATS AND TOOK FULL BACK-SEAT TO THE JEWISH CONGRESS. A photograph (one picture is worth 1,000 words???) of this event appeared on the FRONT of the bimonthly newsletter of the World Jewish Congress April-May (1994) issue. Edgar Bronffman (where have you heard of THIS one before?), their chairman, was speaking to the governing board of the WJC--WHICH MET IN TOTAL SECRECY IN YOUR NATION'S CAPITAL--FOR THREE DAYS, MARCH 16-18, 1994. THIS MEETING WAS NEVER DISCLOSED IN YOUR PAPERS OR ANY NEWS MEDIA. I can only warn you, friends, you are in serious trouble and serious trouble requires SERIOUS SOLUTIONS.
I find myself observing that you dance around an issue until you can no longer discern why, what, where or even if the music is still playing--while you dawdle and prattle and speculate on, even, God's promise of messengers and HOSTS. I find it interesting, for instance, that Lawrence Patterson can shout, draw fish symbols and STILL MISS THE TRUTH OF THE TIMES AND THE FULFILLMENT OF GOD'S VERY OWN PROMISES. Well, so be it. In his Criminal Politics he has offered some observations and proven documentation on this subject of Zionists and the "now" relationships with the Evangelic "so-called 'Christian' " community. WILL YOU AWAKEN FAR TOO LATE??
From Criminal Politics (the front cover picture, by the way--IS NOT "THE" BILL CLINTON YOU THINK YOU ELECTED--check it out!) July 1994. P.O. Box 37812, Cincinnati, OH 45222. It is hard to tell just what is taken from what in his publication and since we have already used so much of the information from original sources, I will have to just give honor and appreciation for a job well done and help bring attention to books utilized and which you can get through Criminal Politics Book Club.
ALLEGIANCE TO REVELATION'S HARLOT!
"Come here, I will show thee the sentence of the great harlot." (Revelation 17:1)
In order to appreciate the depth and breadth of Jewish influence in the Christian community, one needs to read The Zionist Connection II by Alfred Lilienthal, especially Chapter 14, which he titled "Christians in Bondage". In this chapter, he exposed Zionist motives and objectives. (Available from the Criminal Politics Book Club for $29.95.) [H: Please remember this is the only resource for the Kissinger-in-the-KGB book. Please also remember, I asked you not to confuse David Lilienthal of THE USURPERS with this Alfred Lilienthal--although at the moment of writing that reminder, I did not have access to this information. Alfred Lilienthal is a "Jew" who objects to the Zionist takeover of his heritage.]
DESTRUCTIVE JEWISH-ZIONIST INFLUENCE!
Pat Robertson has stated: "During that Six-Day War [June 1967]... the Jewish forces... recaptured the Old City of East Jerusalem, for the first time since Nebuchadnezzar [sic] had invaded Israel (or Judah) in 586 B.C.".
Robertson further states: "Students of Bible prophecy know the words of Jesus Christ that are expressed in the twenty-first chapter of Luke's Gospel, where Jesus said that Jerusalem would be 'trodden under foot of the Gentiles' until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. Christian Bible scholars have looked for centuries for that fulfillment, and in June of 1967 it took place literally".
ROBERTSON'S INTERPRETATIONS ARE WRONG!
Is Robertson correct? First, he should check his history more carefully because Jerusalem was restored under Nehemiah and later the Maccabees, both events subsequent to Nebuchadnezzar. It was finally destroyed by Rome in A.D. 70. Secondly, let's look at the literal translation of Luke 21:24b from the Greek:
"...Jerusalem shall be trodden down by [the] nations until [the] times of [the] nations be fulfilled".
Dispensationalists say that these words of Jesus predicted the return of Israel to the land after the time of the "Gentiles" had run its course, and that in 1948 "Israel" was regathered. Robertson says that the capture of the "the Old City of East Jerusalem... in June of 1967... literally fulfilled Jesus' prophecy".
However, a careful reading shows that the passage says nothing about a restoration of Israel--only that Jerusalem shall be trodden down by nations until the times of nations are fulfilled.
[H: Now you are going to find a LOT MORE wrong with this whole perception and translation as we move along--for instance, there is talk of Billy Graham's role in the Zionist occupation a bit farther along. You don't have any idea--AND OBVIOUSLY NEITHER DOES SIR PATTERSON. BILLY GRAHAM'S WORLDWIDE CRUSADE FROM PUERTO RICO IN 1995 WAS TO BE THE TIMING OF OPERATION BLUE BEAM AND THE HOLOGRAPHIC WORLD-WIDE VIEWING OF GOD IN THE SKY. Now, readers, THAT doesn't have ANYTHING to do with Bible or TRUTH--it is a conjured PROJECT by Governments of the ONE WORLD ORDER for fooling all you people at ONE TIME. It is directly out of the Montauk technical mind-control projects and would run coincidentally with that Graham CRUSADE.]
ISRAEL TODAY IS NOT THE SAME AS ISRAEL OF THE OLD TESTAMENT!
Dispensationalists merely assume that the end of the times of the nations calls for the return of Israel, and they assume that the political entity called "Israel" today is the same as the Israel of the Old Testament. Both assumptions are incorrect.
The next three verses of Luke 21 refer to Jesus' second advent. Therefore, at the end of the trodding down of Jerusalem, Jesus will return.
The orthodox Christian view through the centuries has been that the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70 ushered in the new era (the Christian age--God's promise to Abraham), which would be followed by the second advent. Thus, Jerusalem continues to be trodden down by nations. [H: Good grief, do you just replace one "orthodox" view without substantiation for ANOTHER? One does NOT make the other correct--only TWO INCORRECT ASSUMPTIONS.]
WHO OCCUPIES JERUSALEM?
One of the reasons why many have been misled by the above passage in Luke is the use of the English translation "Gentiles". The Greek word simply means "nations", "multitudes", "people", etc. [H: Now WHY can't these people who find these "mistranslations" reckon that just maybe there are some OTHER MISTRANSLATIONS? WHY DO THEY JUST HAVE TO BASH AND CRASH MY TROOPS AND MESSENGERS?]
Over the centuries the popular connotation of the word "Gentiles" (originally not capitalized) [H: But then, neither was the word "i"srael.] came to mean "all people other than Jews", but its etymology shows its derivation from the Latin meaning "of the same gens, clan or race". It is much more accurate to use "nations" or "peoples" than it is to use "gentiles".
[H: I wonder if this is ANY MORE "wrong" than calling E.J. one day regarding our little S.Y. and saying he was calling from "OVERSEAS" when he was calling from Ohio? That is what Mr. Patterson DID--but then, that was about "business" (his business and MONEY) and perhaps we have TWO SETS OF COMMANDMENTS?--ONE FOR BUSINESS AND ONE FOR TEACHING TRUTH OF RELIGIONS? Just thought I would inquire--as a good "inquiring mind".]
But let's not quibble over the word and miss the meaning of the passage. It simply means that Jerusalem will be trodden down (i.e., never again to be the capital of Israel) by various nations until the second advent of Christ. "Ah, but Israel now occupies Jerusalem", some say, "therefore the prophecy isn't true".
However, Israel doesn't occupy Jerusalem; JEWS occupy it. The two are NOT synonymous!. Israel became defunct at the crucifixion of Christ, and the commonwealth was destroyed in A.D. 70. [H: Say what??] Talmudism was exhumed, not Israel, and TALMUDISTS/ZIONISTS NOW CLAIM TO BE ISRAEL. [H: Well THAT much is true at least. However, the Pharisees were pretty good at imitating these Zionists who followed the Protocols even back in those "good old days". In fact, what is being referred to here as Zionists were the so-called "Scribes and Pharisees".]
If Talmudists/Zionists wish to have their own sovereign state somewhere in the world, I have no objection. But they are NOT entitled to Palestine under Biblical provisions, and their treatment of the Palestinians has been atrocious.
Alfred Lilienthal stated: "The Old Testament unmistakably teaches that no Jewish return save in righteousness may be countenanced and, as the true Orthodox insist, it may be only Messiah-led." (Op. cit. p. 490) [H: OOPS! AND--THAT MESSIAH AIN'T-A-COMIN' 'TIL AFTER THE HOSTS SHOW UP! WHAT A DEE-LEMMA!]
MOST JEWS ARE KHAZARS!
Lilienthal expressed the correct view of Orthodox Jews, but he equates Israel and the Jews, though acknowledging elsewhere that most Jews are KHAZARS, (Lilienthal, pp. 760-762), WHICH MEANS THEY ARE NOT OF SEMITIC STOCK, LET ALONE DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM. Pat Robertson and other dispensationalists, therefore, seriously err in eschatological matters, and their loyalties to the Jews are sadly misplaced.
[H: That is a gross understatement if ever one was made. These men in point SERVE THE ZIONISTS IN EVERY WAY! JERRY FALWELL, FOR INSTANCE, SAID FAR AND WIDE: "I AM A ZIONIST AND PROUD OF IT"! OK, I DON'T HAVE TO ARGUE WITH THE POSSIBILITIES FOR HIS "SALVATION", DO I?]
BILLY GRAHAM'S ROLE IN THE ZIONIST OCCUPATION!
Lilienthal also notes that Billy Graham played a prominent part in solidifying Christian opinion about the right of Zionists to Palestine. He stated, "A particularly vivid influence has been the beautiful film made by Billy Graham, His Land, which was viewed by 15 million across this country and Canada.
"This superbly photographed visual survey of the land of Israel, accompanied by narrated biblical prophecies and religious songs, celebrates the fact that God has kept His word to the Jew, that he has fulfilled prophetic promises given 2,500 years ago by restoring Israel in the 20th century". (ibid. p. 488) [H: I wonder if all this MISINTERPRETATION AND MISINFORMATION is a reason Billy Graham said to millions of viewers on Larry King Live--that he "suffered terrible feelings of failure at his ministry". One always suffers miserably when one TEACHES THE WRONG THING AND DAMAGES ANOTHER'S SOUL!]
However, Lilienthal did not share the view of Graham and the producers of the film. After citing Christian biblicists who disagreed with the film's representations, he stated: "So, for many, His Land provided the first and only Christian explanation for the creation of modern Israel". (ibid, p. 489)
The money used to produce this film came from hard-working Christians and others, who not only contributed to the millions of dollars in Graham's coffers, but also paid (and continue to pay) taxes to support the anti-Christian, anti-First Amendment Jewish state in the Middle East. According to Lilienthal, Billy Graham came under the heavy influence of Rabbi Marc Tanenbaum, then executive director of the Synagogue Council of America. [H: Hummmnnn!]
* * *
I think this is important enough to continue when we next write--if we have the time to do so. I do HONOR this man for FINALLY taking a stand. I am sorry it came only after this bunch ATTACKED HIM--for it smells of retaliation. However, ANY way a man can come into knowing and recognition--God is at work!
Why would one Lawrence Patterson have such OBJECTION to any possibilities of truth regarding myself and my mission? Because his first and only recognition and input was based on and around GEORGE GREEN AND HIS IMBECILIC PRESENTATIONS OF HIS OWN UFO IMPLICATIONS AND RIDICULOUS RELATED MATERIAL. AND, AS ALWAYS--MONEY CONCERNS. WHAT DO "I" THINK OF THIS PERSON? I DON'T! TRUTH, HOWEVER, IS WHEREVER YOU FIND IT!
REC #1 HATONN
SUN., AUG. 14, 1994 9:35 A.M. YEAR 7, DAY 363
SUN., AUG. 14, 1994
I realize that this is an "off the wall" subject--especially to begin a "talk". However, there are so many subclinical diabetics and positively diagnosed diabetics that I feel I need to speak to this subject. This is ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT FOR ALCOHOL DRINKERS.
I am not going to give a lecture on this subject but I want to point out what is happening so you can attend yourselves and watch for symptoms which WILL be happening to you if you fit these categories--or, even if you do not.
I won't define "they" as anything other than as we have already referred to "them" which are your enemies of freedom and LIFE. THEY have been at it with diabetes for a long, long time and are now utilizing the imbalance now created in individuals to kill or hamper whole-body health.
What is happening in the alcoholic "seizures" when a person begins to "dry out" is purely and simply insulin shock. Some of you old timers in the medical halls of input can remember that along with electric shock treatment for mentally ill patients--"they" also "treated" with insulin shock.
You have reached a time when there is so much garbage going into you and a time when even the "low calorie" foods are NOT--along with the stimulation of insulin output triggered by the totally "diet" products "for diabetics".
Bodies are having to produce unduly large amounts of insulin to counter the glucose overload of the body. This is OK for sporadic indulging but what is happening is the constant "overload" which is debilitating. This, further, causes a response when "nothing" is present, overdose of insulin occurs and the resulting problems. This can be anything from sudden heart arrest to nervousness to insulin shock.
I developed the "trim" products so that there WOULD BE NOTHING to trigger insulin overproduction. The hype you will feel is strictly from ingredients which cause some nervousness possibly--but NO "OVER" INSULINIZING. IF ANYTHING, THE INGREDIENTS WILL ADJUST THE BODY TO RESPOND TO FAT LIQUEFACTION AND UP METABOLISM WITHOUT INCREASING THE OUTPUT OF AN OVERABUNDANCE OF INSULIN--WHICH WOULD BE REFERRED TO AS AN INSULIN "SHOWER", JUST AS YOU CAN HAVE WHAT IS CALLED A "THYROID SHOWER". Our intent and the product is designed to increase metabolism and stop excessive fat production while moving out overabundant storage of fat in the cells, sluff off the byproducts and move them OUT OF THE BODY. This is not something which replaces "insulin" nor triggers overproduction of same.
There is a "balancing" period of time involved as well--you don't pop a pill and it's all over with the fat-sluff. USE YOUR BRAINS! A BODY HAS TO ADJUST AND IF YOU SIMPLY THINK YOU HAVE A MIRACLE YOU ARE SIMPLY GOING TO HAVE A "WEIGHT-GAIN" MIRACLE.
I cannot possibly imagine why you want to look like sticks--God made you in rounded perfection so that the body can sustain itself if necessary if placed in a position of being "without". You who are sticks--are going to have problems and they will be as bad or worse--than the obese. Gross obesity is not at point here for THAT bears its own medical health problems which I won't take time to discuss at this sitting.
These are the reasons, however, that I do urge you to stay on Gaia products wherein the cellular structure and organ output is able to come into functioning balance according to YOUR structure. Further, I urge the whole grain, specifically Spelta so that the balancing of nutrients can keep a more steady level of glucose circulating. THIS is the problem of all the junk foods--they hit rapidly, cause release of insulin to handle them and then, wham, leave you totally without resource for energy and you go through the cycles again. This is fine to know but will not change much until you decide to change attitudes--and THAT is within the mind. That is the SAME MIND that is producing too much insulin so you really DO have a problem going.
I am warning you now, however, that as this medical deficiency increases and more and more resistance is built against the overflow of insulin (which ultimately will not convert the sugars at all), you may well have to move onto artificial intake of insulin in order to balance the body. It is going to be ever increasingly difficult to lose weight or maintain weight loss if the tendency is to obesity and/or eating habits get increasingly worse--as they will unless something drastic, like a shutdown of Willie Wonka's Chocolate Factory, happens.
The "medical profession", by and large doesn't know anything about this problem and they certainly are NOT going to listen to a "nut from outer space". So, what have you? If you can look squarely at this problem--and you find you have it possibly--pay attention! THIS IS THE ONE MOST PROMINENT PROBLEM NOW IN TREATMENT OF ALCOHOL ADDICTION FOR IT BECOMES A FACT THAT "GETTING OFF" OF ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION CAN KILL YOU. HOW BETTER TO DEPOPULATE THAN THROUGH THIS KIND OF "ADDICTION"--A LITERALLY VALID TERM FOR THIS SYNDROME NOW PRESENT. MAYBE YOU CAN CALL IT "THE HATONN SYNDROME" AND EVERYONE WILL IGNORE YOU!
Remember that if there is a subtle way to KILL you--THEY HAVE IT AND ARE NOW USING IT. THEY are also, you will note, taking more and more things away so that you cannot balance yourselves. The stuff, for instance, in the "diet pills" and especially amphetamines--triggers massive outputs of insulin, as does the major ingredient in such as "Dexatrim".
I am certainly NOT telling you to give up your special treats--I am telling you to pay attention. What happens is the HABIT of indulging that gives the problem, mostly. You will have a buildup of insulin and spillage and, if there is nothing to use it, you have reactions. The "surprise" or proper triggering to production and release according to intake--even of total sugar content, is natural--and what's more the body "natural" will produce and release the exact necessary amount. Often times NOW, however, a blast of sudden intake of sugar will give almost the same sickly-nervous reaction as oncoming insulin shock--BECAUSE OF THE RESISTANCE BEING BUILT UP IN BODIES.
I have badly presented this in my attempt to give you a generalization of the problem in point here. Forgive me for that, scientists. If, however, you doctors and medical scientists don't like MY generalization--THEN GET OUT HERE AND STOP THIS INSANITY BEING PUT AGAINST THE POPULACE. Substances added which inhibit or cause resistance against insulin use is abominable--just as is lacing tobacco and tobacco papers with addicting opiates (never mind the nicotine, as that is a different kind of problem), along with adding by-products of addicting opiates to alcohol beverages. REMEMBER, READERS, THE ELITE ARE DEPOPULATING THE EARTH AND THESE ARE THE SUBTLE WAYS WHICH WILL BE USED ALONG WITH THE TERRIBLE PLAGUES AND WARS. HOWEVER, NEITHER I NOR ANYONE ELSE CAN HELP YOU IF YOU DON'T WANT TO HELP YOURSELVES.
Now don't go ape-ballistic on me. I am talking about a routine of HABITUAL life-style--not the sugar-overload of a party or two. That may not be GOOD FOR YOU --but it is a "natural" activity which reminds the body to act as it SHOULD. Go indulge selves--but to indulge on sugars and junk which turns to fat and sugar on a regular basis--even if you carefully count the calories and limit intake accordingly --will set you up for this dastardly wheel of problems.
There are a few who are utilizing what we call "insol"--an insulin DNAd dria. It is "iffy" at best, if you have gone over the line and into clinically recognized diabetes. We can try to rebalance--but once there is failure of a system it is very difficult to restart it. Don't be alarmed--just act wisely and if insulin intake is necessary--go take it. Sometimes the intake of high frequency dria product will help, in other cases the ELF of low frequency-based drias will do it--but this is one dis-ease that can be treated by insulin intake, so don't botch up your system if you NEED IT. IF YOU NEED IT--TAKE IT. The side-effects of not taking what you need is worse if unattended.
Stop giving power to the mole-hill so that it becomes some kind of a "sacred" mountain.
WHAT YOU DESERVE POSSIBLY?
I am barraged with "prayers" which say "we don't deserve this..." or "that", especially "this New World Order thrust upon us helpless children". Don't you? What did you do to STOP IT? And what are YOU doing right now to STOP IT? As I look over the "testing ground" of the NWO at Woodstock to see how far they have gotten with the youth and mindset of your people--it is quite interesting to note that mostly it would seem that you possibly DESERVE a whole lot more "bad" stuff! Out there at Woodstock are the youngsters who would ordinarily RUN YOUR NATION!! YOU have bred a bunch of dead-brained robonoids. The interesting thing is, however, that they will do about anything they are told to do. This makes it bad UNTIL you give them something GOOD to do and then they will turn and do good--WHEN YOU REMOVE THE BRAIN-DEADENING SUBSTANCES FROM THEM. When you stop the NEW WORLD ORDER--AND THE DRUG TRADE BY YOUR ELITE RULERS, you will heal the noids. How do you do this? Well, humorously speaking, you will have a lot of insulin seizures! Then you'll have to allow God and Christ back into your CHURCHES, and boy, is that one going to be a "blast".
Mostly you cut off the blood-supply to the beast! Cut off his endless pit of money sucked from you-the-people, shine the light of truth on his deeds and remove the POWER of position in the false seats of government--and what will THEY do? They stay in power because YOU ALLOW IT AND CONTINUE TO FINANCE IT! "They" can't even get a job anywhere else--so you feed them your very selves in your search for charity unto the Elite.
Man may be equal at birth--he surely does get "unequal" as he experiences--and you better get some unequally qualified people to begin to set up structures BASED ON THE FOUNDATION OF THE CONSTITUTION--and get rid of the unlimited piles of garbage which are "unconstitutional" and, with it--the real garbage "men" themselves (using the term "men" equally for the female of your species but no longer "women" or "ladies").
I realize this revolvement will be difficult. Why do I conjure a new word "revolvement"? Because "revolution" has become a word of WAR and TREASON. All you want to do is REVOLVE back into Constitutional status. This is not necessarily a REVOLT. So, I use "revolvement". THEY can use and abuse language --why do we not do the same and pop THEIR big hot-air balloons?
Ok, I'm rebutted in any expression which infers you can possibly USE YOUR CONSTITUTION. Well, you are right in that THEY aren't going to let you do that if they can stop it. So, you go and you use what you can WHILE YOU CAN, then you stop when death is the response--DEAD MARTYRS ARE USELESS!! I will tell you now that almost ALL incarcerated persons are worse than USELESS--for attention has to be turned to obtaining their release if they are to ever serve again. This is what the enemy plans on you doing--every time. You see, the adversary NEVER has to really change his operations--he works on the physical senses of mankind and he NEVER "HAS TO" CHANGE FOR THE SAME OLD GAME WORKS EVERY TIME.
I have observed WITH you that you have to be careful, especially about forming armed militias--under the hot-headed power-focused PATRIOTS who would march on Washington or IMPEACH BY FORCE A PRESIDENT, OR, OR, OR. Until you have support and MASSIVE military teams behind you--ARMED REBELLION WILL ONLY GET YOU KILLED AND/OR INCARCERATED--MOSTLY INCARCERATED AT FIRST AND FINALLY, SIMPLY KILLED IN MASS. With your pistol or shotgun you may be able to defend your door from the FIRST officer or agent who appears and maybe even the first fifteen--but THEY will send more and THEY WILL KILL YOU IF THEY WANT TO, ON THE SCENE OR ON THE JUDICIAL ALTAR--WHICHEVER COMES FIRST.
In August 15, 1994 a little article appears in U.S. News and World Report regarding the "citizen militias". There is nice mention of the Militia of Montana (MOM) from where we get a lot of extremely critical and factual information. It is that which offers hope--not that they all carry a bunch of guns. The information alerts all others--the guns are very localized indeed, at this point.
Will there ever come a time when the sword should be used? I can't think of any--but I do not rule it out as long as mankind is in the mindset into which he has evolved. You may well have to grow "OUT" of your misteachings and misperceptions and "INTO" other realizations of confronting problems.
I would like to share the article and then remind you that it is the "laws" which must be attended in HONOR and service under the Constitution--not the battlefields of bombs and rifles.
It is full realization here that I suggest ALL OF YOU OUT THERE had to start somewhere--because you didn't know about a Committee of 17 who could help you. Now it is time as you do come to confront the COMMITTEES who have torn you down to insist they rebuild enough to the point where YOU can again act on the legislative truth of your Constitution. Easy? No--but THEY will see the advantage of helping. You need resources--and they have resources. You need leadership--and they have power and CAN LEAD. Why don't you change the minds and try to change the "gun" regulations?
THE RISE OF CITIZEN MILITIAS
In Montana and other states, fury at gun control and government sparks a call to arms.
In 1938, Lee Simpson shot three people at his ranch in central Montana. Two were young men he thought had been stealing his cattle, one a deputy sent later to arrest him. After a trial, he was sentenced to death. On the gallows, just before he became one of the last men publicly hanged in America, he was asked if he had any final words. "Not that I know of," Simpson said.
That same willingness to take the law into one's own hands is again loose in the West, especially in Montana, where there is rising resentment against government. This sentiment, of course, is shared by many Americans, but recently some Montanans have begun seeking frontier justice under the rubric of Revolutionary War-era law.
Hundreds--possibly thousands--of Montanans are joining "citizen militias". They are spurred by passage of the Brady law, which applies waiting periods to gun purchases; they fear the law is the first step toward Big Brother's confiscation of their guns. Similar organizing drives have popped up in other states, including Florida, Texas and California. Their agenda is to thwart gun restrictions and fight most government intervention in their lives. Among the claims made by more extremist militia organizers is that a secret cadre of leaders hopes to rule the world through one global government. As evidence, they cite such reports as:
* Unmarked black helicopters appearing in many locations, often threatening local residents by shining lasers into their eyes.
* Gurkha troops and Royal Hong Kong policemen regularly training in the Montana mountains.
* One-hundred-car trains filled with United Nations equipment, and cargo ships ferrying Russian and East German trucks and personnel carriers.
* The Crips, Bloods and other street gangs being recruited and trained to serve as "shock troops" and "cannon fodder" for house-to-house searches conducted by New World Order officers.
[H: You had better remember that U.S. News and World Report IS A TOTAL ESTABLISHMENT NEWSPAPER--AND LOOK AT THE RIDICULE BUILT IN HERE TO CAUSE READERS TO SIMPLY ACCEPT THESE PEOPLE WHO THINK THESE THINGS TO LOOK STUPID AND ABSURD!!! The facts are that ALL of these things listed ARE FACTUAL--but look how this is handled.]
Despite these apocalyptic ALLEGATIONS, so far there has been no violence. Most militia organizers seem to want to keep it that way. John McGlothlen, a 47-year-old sheetrocker in Kalispell, has organized three militia meetings in the western Montana town, with peaceful turnouts of 300, 800 and 150 persons earlier this year. He dismisses the wilder rumors. "They're kind of like Sasquatch", he says. Some law enforcement officers, however, are worried that more-radical groups may provoke a confrontation to win converts for their cause. Some gun-toting extremists are planning to go to Washington in mid-September to put "traitors" in Congress on trial before a "citizens" court. There's also concern that in hotbeds of discontent, extremists may elect a sheriff, giving them access to law enforcement databases and intelligence reports.
Militia proponents in Montana cite both the state Constitution, which allows for an unofficially organized militia, and the federal Constitution as legal bases for a citizens' militia. But state authorities dispute these interpretations. Flathead County attorney Tom Esch says militia organizers ignore other constitutional amendments and court cases, which stipulate that the National Guard is the state's only militia and that any militia must be "legally summoned" under civilian-government control.
Legalities aside, feelings are running high. In April, in Eastern Montana, 15 or so men, calling themselves "freemen", placed million-dollar bounties on a county judge, sheriff, county attorney and other local officials who they felt were infringing on the freemen's rights by seizing and auctioning land that had been foreclosed. [H: We have to admit--it is tempting!] Though not directly connected to supporters of a citizens' militia, the freemen share many of their beliefs. Four freemen were arrested on charges including disturbing the peace and threatening a peace officer. But a dozen, mainly farmers and ranchers who had lost their homesteads to foreclosure, were still at large. [H: Do you see that the local enforcement people OF THE LAWS, are only the tiny most visible fragment of a system gone insane--the problem is at the top and underneath there is not the will nor daring to stop the insane march across freedom. As long as what is happening in Kern County to Ekkers is allowed to continue within the COURTS THEMSELVES--there is little hope for you, citizens. When the corruption has infiltrated within the very fiber of the beings and they work their evil tricks one with another in hidden security--you can't regain ANYTHING--you will simply continue the march down-hill.]
Opposition to gun control is the catalyst that spawned growing support for the militias. Many of the state's 800,000 residents believe Montana's crime rate is relatively low because their weapons are a deterrent. "These people understand the Bill of Rights and the right to keep and bear arms", says Bill Boharski, a three-term Republican state legislator, "and when somebody starts infringing on those rights, they get concerned".
Militiamen and women have other reasons for long-simmering anger against government. Their fears and outrage have been inflamed by two recent incidents, called by some the Lexington and Concord of the 1990s. One is the Branch Davidian conflagration in Waco, Texas, last year; the other is the 1992 standoff in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, between Randy Weaver and federal agents, which left one agent and Weaver's wife and son dead. To some militia supporters, Waco and Ruby Ridge are evidence that the government is a tool of sinister outside forces seeking to control the United States.
Groups lobbying for a citizen's militia include many types of people. Some are ordinary citizens upset at what they view as growing federal intrusion into their lives and who are threatened by the economic woes in the timber, farming and mining industries. The freemen and some others believe all levels of modern government are illegitimate. Some refuse to pay income tax or carry a driver's license. Red Beckman of Billings, one of the most influential people in the movement, says, "The Federal Reserve Bank, the IMF [International Monetary Fund], the New World Order and all that gang" seek dictatorial control of the world. Some are conservative Christians who support home schooling and are particularly upset about homosexuals. Finally, there are White supremacists and neo-Nazis, whose groups have been growing in the Northwest.
[H: Can you not see that all of these things as listed above--HURT YOUR CAUSE--THEY DO NOT HELP IT! IT IS FINE WITH ME THAT MY ENEMIES ARE EQUALLY DISPERSED AMONG THE REAL ADVERSARIAL GROUPS AND THESE WOULD-BE "GOODLY" BUT MISGUIDED SOULS. WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE--WHO NEEDS ENEMIES? YOU NOT ONLY "LOOK" KOOKY--YOU ARE CERTAINLY DESERVING OF THE HONORABLE TITLE--BECAUSE ACTIONS ARE BASED ON PHYSICAL FORCE AND NOT ON WISDOM IN BEHAVIOR AND INTENT!]
In Noxon, the Trochmanns--brothers John and David and David's son Randy--have started MOM, the Militia of Montana, Alpha Unit. They attend gun shows and other militia's organizing meetings throughout the Northwest, selling their video-and audio-tapes, literature and pepper-gas dispensers. Human rights activists in Montana say the Trochmanns have been members of the Aryan Nation and anti-semitic Christian fundamentalist groups. [H: Truth or lie? It doesn't matter because now it has again been STATED IN AN INTERNATIONAL ESTABLISHMENT NEWS MAGAZINE. FACTS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE!] The Trochmanns deny that, claiming there are Jews, Asians and Blacks in their militia. Sitting in the tiny town's only cafe, the Trochmanns rail against the U.S. Government.
Randy: "They've perverted the intent of the Constitution and come up with a bastardized form of illegitimate government".
David: "Three hundred families run the world and plan global conquest".
John: "We don't want bloodshed. We want to use the ballot box and the jury box. We don't want to go to the cartridge box. But we will if we have to".
[H: Now, if you were fresh from Woodstock--what would you believe--if ANYTHING? Oh my. IF YOU CAN'T SEE BEYOND A GUN BILL OF SOME KIND--YOU ARE BLIND AS THE PROVERBIAL SALAMANDER OF AIEDO CAVES!]
* * *
All I will add at this time is that RELIGION is going to be a whole lot worse to CURE! In fact, IF you can't separate "Christ" as in EMOTIONAL STATE OF BEING from ones considered to be "Christlike" as in "Jesus"--you will never make it, world--NEVER. For in the assumption of only ONE Christed being in Jesus or ANY OTHER SINGULAR PERSON, YOU NEGATE THE RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD WHO ACTUALLY ARE CHRISTIAN--BUT DO NOT ACCEPT THE "JESUS" AS THE ONLY "TOP BANANA". The Crusades were the bloodiest thing ever perpetrated so it could NOT have been a truly "Christian" enterprise--but it was in the name of the one THEY called JESUS THE CHRIST! What a grand misery that must have been to a nice guy who knew GODLINESS! By the way, when you wonder about how this can come to be--REMEMBER: KHAZARIAN ZIONISTS ARE THE SATANIC SERVANTS OF THE WORLD--AND THEY WILL DIVIDE AND USE EVERYTHING THAT COMES ALONG TO CONFUSE, ABUSE AND SUCK YOU INTO THE EVIL TRAP--AND EVANGELISTS OF RELIGIOUS DO-GOODING ARE THE VERY TOP OF THE HEAP OF DISINFORMERS--THEY DIRECTLY SERVE SATAN WHILE SOME EVEN THINK THEY ARE SERVING GOD. SO BE IT--THE TIME OF THE LORD IS AT HAND AND LIGHT SHALL BE SHOWN UPON THE DARK PLACES.
THE REMAINDER OF THIS JOURNAL IS A
COLLECTION OF TIMELY NEWS AND/OR
THE NEWS DESK
The time is NOW! We, as a Nation, are at a cross-roads. It is decision time. You readers have asked for it, so now I am asking you to back-up your words with deeds, support, and feedback.
Current Government is at its end. Change is on the horizon and it is up to you. We must take back control of our country. The only viable alternative remaining is to start anew, using the existing magnificent document upon which our nation was founded--the Constitution of the United States. It is our only hope.
What do I mean by these statements? It is now time to form a Constitutional government apart from Washington, D. C. that is for and of the people--NOT with the present government's representatives or special interest groups.
What are your thoughts on this matter? Please write and share them. If you don't want to include your name or address, that is understandable--but, by all means, do write.
P.O. BOX 27800
LAS VEGAS, NV 89126
* * *
RONN JACKSON UPDATE
During the last two weeks I have met with Ronn personally for a number of days at his new location in southern Nevada.
This particular prison seems to be considerably smaller than the northern correctional center and, in many ways, seems more relaxed.
The inmates in this particular facility, however, consist largely of child and adult sexual-abuse felons, as well as many drug-related convicts.
Ronn's overall attitude is extremely positive and he has been overwhelmed at the tremendous response by CONTACT readers. To answer the incredible volume of mail which Ronn receives, as you might well imagine, requires considerable postage, paper and envelopes. He is not allowed to receive money through the mail, and until recently has not been allowed self-addressed, stamped envelopes. Lately, however, "they" have been allowing the stamped return envelopes through to him. Other than the tremendous gratitude Ronn wishes to express to all of you concerned readers, he has but one request: Please enclose a self-addressed stamped envelope with your letters--it really does make a difference and he would like to respond to each and all.
As yet there is no specific information concerning his future release, but optimism is in the air.
It is my understanding that the pressure has not subsided on the Governor's Office, and we at CONTACT would like to ask that you continue to write until Ronn is released. That address is:
Governor Bob Miller
Carson City, NV 89710
And, again, Ronn's new address is:
P. O. Box 100
Jean, NV 89026
Ronn Jackson Update
* * *
Re: THE ORIGINAL BONUS BABY
CONTACT, Inc. News
You "Goofed". Our Certificate has a CONTRACT, and its face identifies $1000 GOLD DOLLARS. It's the BONUS BABY. The CONTRACT has been filed of RECORDED RECORD per: "Se legaliza la firma, que antecedes" and "Se legaliza la firma noel contenido".
The contract, the liens, the Legislative Resolutions, Legislative Acts, Annexes, etc., are all of public record, duly recorded. And all that beautiful interest has been accumulating since May 1, 1875. --V.K. Durham
WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION & GATT
In an article by Patrick J. Buchanan, appearing in the July 29 edition of Southern California's DAILY NEWS, [quoting:]
Friends, keep an eye on Capitol Hill.
Word is out: The White House, in collaboration with the Republican leadership, may try to ram the huge General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade treaty (GATT) through both houses of Congress--before the August recess.
If it happens, the GOP will have given Bill Clinton yet another resurrecting victory. And history will indict this party as co-conspirator in a Munich-style betrayal of American sovereignty and the biggest sellout of states' rights in modern times.
For GATT creates a new global authority, the World Trade Organization [WTO], with unprecedented power.